Tag Archives: Science

How Trump Thinks And Why He Wins

Every new field that Trump enters always has experts predicting that Trump will fail, be it in the field of real estate, media, politics, economics, etc. But Trump keeps winning. Therefore his continuous success, in radically different fields, cannot be accidental and must have a foundation in strategic thinking. So Trump has strategy, he is just playing a different game than everyone else. For instance, most everyone’s strategy is like a methodical game of chess, slowly building one small win upon the next. In contrast, Trump’s strategy is like a hyper changing game of Othello, where seemingly massive losses can be suddenly flipped to wins in the end.

But no one has understood how Trump’s thinking accomplishes this. The external aspect that gets noticed most is Trump’s intensely emotional language and communication style. This is assumed by everyone to be detrimental behavior due to lack of self-control. Not so. This action is also strategic. Trump’s language/communication purposefully serves to distract/misdirect opponents by triggering them while simultaneously attracting/bonding with followers by engaging them.

Even those closely working with Trump, like former White House council Don NcGahn, at best can only acquire peripheral insight into Trump’s thinking. A recent AP article highlighted an interview with McGahn in which McGahn noted about Trump: “He goes through a decision-tree faster than anyone I’ve seen, to get where he thinks the situation is going to go…. He thinks differently than anyone else I’ve represented.”

While McGahn’s observation is completely right, the actual process of how Trump thinks still remains a mystery. This is because Trump has a unique asymmetric thinking process, like that of the greatest military leaders in history of; Alexander the Great, Hannibal, Genghis Kahn and Napoleon. These leaders continuously faced immense adversity, along with overwhelming odds, and still won within the political/military field. Trump is just doing it now within the political/economic field.

In order to truly understand how this thinking process is unique, a new breakthrough paradigm on the brain/mind dynamic needs to first be outlined. This dynamic can be explained through computer terminology; where the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is a separate operating system that runs and restructures the brain. In turn, the mind is comprised of a dual operating system of intelligence and emotion. Because intelligence and emotion function through processes is why each is also a system. Now, a quick breakdown of each system.

The human intelligence system is comprised of multiple components of; the Self-intelligence, along with Creative, Reactive and Rational intelligence. The principal dynamic agent is the Self intelligence, the component humans perceive and identify them self to be, which includes the core attributes of personality, talents and interests. The Self intelligence learns from external experiences and from the internal information presented to it by Creative, Reactive and Rational intelligence. This information is presented as choices for each Self intelligence to analyze and make decisions on.

The human emotion system has functions of:

  • Imparting context to information by attaching itself to all intelligence components, except for Rational intelligence.
  • Giving the Self intelligence the feelings of significance, passion, purpose and drive. Furthermore, emotion also provides physiological guidance, which is labeled as intuition.
  • Being a catalyst for the force and transmission capacity of intelligence. Then the more intense the emotion, the more that emotion is able to increase the force and transmission capacity of intelligence.

So this is the internal process of the mind components of intelligence and emotion that can be understood, in essence, as human thought. (Deeper insight and video on this paradigm at: oisource.com/itp-origins) This process of interaction between your self and your separate thoughts is so seamless and fluid that most humans considered their thinking to be the function of one solitary unit. But it is not. Those humans who do not sense their self, and the decisions they make, as distinct from the interactive thought choices provided to them lack the ability to be creative and are thereby labeled within Psychology to have a ‘fixed mindset’. Those humans that do have that self-awareness are labeled to have a ‘growth mindset’. Societal disruptors like Trump and all breakthrough innovators naturally have a strong ‘growth-mindset’ awareness. (Deeper insight at: oisource.com/innovators)

Most humans also automatically rely on their Rational thought, which is slow and methodical because it does not have emotion attached. Rational thought at its core contains only old information that was attained through learning. So only slow aggregation of old information into something new can be achieved with Rational thinking, which is a highly valued attribute in stable fields like math, science, engineering etc. But Creative and Reactive thought at their core always contain original information and ideas that can be used in more dynamic fields and conditions. Therefore humans within fields that have continuously changing, complex and challenging conditions need to use Creative and Reactive thought. But most humans use this thinking incidentally and tentatively. In contrast, Trump has a naturally developed ability to purposefully and aggressively use his emotionally intense Creative and Reactive thought as tools. Furthermore, Trump uniquely does this by using Creative and Reactive thought as counterpoints against the other to attain the widest scope of original ideas with the best potential for success. This asymmetric process produces profound, and incredibly fast thought experiments. The effect of this type of thinking can come across and seem like instability, but it is not. This type of thinking is what enables Trump, like the aforementioned military leaders, to continuously develop dynamic strategies that outflank his opponents.

The irony is that complex and challenging conditions, like geopolitics and global economics, force most humans to slow down their thinking and become even more cautious/tentative to develop strategies. This reaction becomes a distinct advantage for Trump because the speed and scope of his thinking expands proportionally to the challenges around him. This means that Trump actually becomes more emboldened and has a greater ability to win against opponents in his current more challenging conditions than he did even in his past less challenging conditions. That is why when Trump now simultaneously takes on the entire media establishment, democratic party, deep state, global elite and opposing nations – the advantage to win is always with Trump.

This type of thinking, to purposefully and aggressively use mind components as tools can now be learned through a new breakthrough training called the ITP (Innovative Thinking Process) at: oisource.com/itp

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Why Augmented Reality Will Be Remarkable And Virtual Reality Will Be Regulated

The remarkable potential of Augmented Reality is just starting to be realized. It will continue to thrive and advance throughout all the fields of business, science, medicine, education, government, military and entertainment. Augmented Reality will then take a hyper leap forward once the Unified Field Theory in physics is understood. At that time it will become accepted that mass and density are independent states interlinked only in nature, but mass specifically can be produced separately within Augmented Reality. This will be achieved by isolating images within areas where intense frequencies can be emitted from one source and then forcibly restricted by another source, thereby increasing the frequencies amplitude to attain mass without density at specific points. In essence, Augmented Reality will evolve into the first Holodeck. This will just be an augmented process of nature where the non-physical constructs of quantum frequencies (i.e. the field) self-restrict into the physical construct of a particle. So that’s the remarkable value of Augmented Reality. It will always be just an extension of nature. Consequently, Augmented Reality will only help humans become more creative and evolve society as a whole.

The reason for this positive outcome is due to Augmented Reality only being superposed onto our Genuine Reality. Therefore no matter how advanced the technology becomes, Augmented Reality will still enable the mind to have a steady connection to our Genuine Reality. This is a critical aspect because Genuine Reality, as-it-is, has enough challenges of emotional and intelligence complexity for the mind to properly function within. So adding any additional interaction with visual and auditory technology only has the result of separating the mind, to one degree or another, from Genuine Reality. In the future, it will be understood that within our Genuine Reality there is already a separation between the physical brain and the cognitive mind. Furthermore the mind is not just one component but comprised of multiple components. Therefore there is an additional separation within your mind between the identity you sense and perceive your Self to be and your thoughts, intuition and emotion. So there are already two stages of separation between your Self and Genuine Reality as-it-is. That’s why something as elementary as a movie can separate your mind, to some extent, from Genuine Reality. This is what Psychology labels as experience-taking.

Since Augmented Reality is only being superposed on Genuine Reality, a combined experience is produced which limits the potential level of additional emotional and intelligence complexity that the mind is challenged with to experience. But Virtual Reality is completely and fundamentally different from Augmented Reality, even though the names and commercial terminology used for both sound similar. They are in fact so radically different that Virtual Reality can actually be described as having the same effect on the mind as poison has on the body. Yes, a correlation can be made between poison and Virtual Reality. Poison unhinges the operating system of a physical organism until it leads to the organism’s failure. So a higher level of poison just leads to an accelerated rate of unhinging the operating system of that organism. In turn, Virtual Reality has the same effect on the cognitive mind. Virtual Reality unhinges the operating system of the cognitive mind until it leads to the mind’s failure to comprehend the difference between Genuine Reality and the substituted Virtual Reality. This is possible because Virtual Reality does not just superpose images and sound but instead substitutes a new reality by completely isolating the minds vision and auditory experience. Therefore the more intense the Virtual Reality, the greater the emotional and intelligence complexity that the mind is challenged with to experience. Which leads to an accelerated rate at which the mind is separated from Genuine Reality. This process of separation from Genuine Reality is what unhinges the operation of the cognitive mind just like poison unhinges the operation of the physical organism.

Inevitably, Virtual Reality technology will advance until its commercial and illicit use will have devastating affects on society. There will be lawsuits against the companies, wherever they may be in the world, making and using this technology. The government will also start targeting those same companies due to the technology being used by criminal organization and rogue nations. Eventually, government will regulate all Virtual Reality technology and designate its use solely to approved agencies. The reason Virtual Reality will not be banned and outlawed completely is because it, like poison, can have extremely beneficial effects in specific circumstances. For instance, specific poison, in specific amounts, under specific controlled conditions, can actually heal and transform organisms. Similarly, Virtual Reality will be used in specific situations in the medical field to heal trauma patients. It will also be used in specific situations in the military field to transform a terrorist into a model citizen. So in the end, Virtual Reality will have uses. But those uses will not be scalable, sustainable or commercial.

This forecast, by itself, will not stop companies and investors from collectively allocating billions of dollars over the next decade into Virtual Reality. But the fact that almost all will lose their entire investment just may give some pause to consider this alternative paradigm. If you are part of a leadership team investing your time and/or money in the development of Virtual Reality then OIsource ( oiscource.com ) can help you create a strategy which will give your investment the best chance of success in the very narrow future window you will have.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

What Corporations Will Rule The World With Their AI

Vladimir Putin correctly noted that: “Whoever becomes the leader in this sphere will become the ruler of the world.” But how can your corporation become that AI leader within your business ecosystem? The answer is by developing AI that is the best at duplicating how the mind functions. But to date that has been impossible because Neuroscientists have no serious model on the process of how the mind actually functions. Their widespread assumption is that millions of neurons fire in the brain to miraculously produce the mind. They equate brain with mind, even though each are separate things. Because Neuroscientists can’t explain what they’re talking about as a process, means that they don’t know what they’re talking about.

Is there a valid brain/mind model that is directionally accurate?
The mind components of Self, Divergent Thought, Intuition and Emotion cannot originate from a brain cell that breaks down into molecules, atoms and subatomic particles. There is simply no capacity within the construct of matter to harbor the mind. But there is an alternative Mind Model that is a valid new paradigm. Within this new paradigm it is more accurate to look at the brain/mind dynamic in computer terminology; where the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is a separate operating system that runs and restructures the brain.

The human mind saves to memory all sensory information input that the body sees, hears and experiences. Memory is therefore just established information that the mind can access, use and assimilate into new information. In this process, the mind’s force (e.g. volts) and transmission capacity (e.g. amps) is limited by how the physical brain is neurologically wired. Therefore it becomes necessary for the brain to be constantly rewired by the mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing force and transmission capacity needs. So the more the mind is stimulated to assimilate information, the more the mind rewires and expands the brain’s capabilities.

But the physical brain offers resistance (e.g. ohms) to the cognitive mind rewiring it. The addition of emotion to this process acts as a catalyst that stimulates the mind to greater output. Emotion also increases the mind’s force to overcome the brain’s resistance and guides the aggregation of divergent thought to achieve innovation. Further specifics dealing with how the mind functions are found in the Mind Model video on OIsource.com.

Why has Neuroscience failed to develop this Mind Model?
A model of how the mind functions cannot be derived in isolation. It must be interconnected within a model of how the entire universal cognitive system functions. But the cognitive system does not function in isolation either. It must be interconnected within a model of how the entire universal physical system functions. This means that physics, the mother of all science, must be first to lay the foundation by introducing an interconnected physical and cognitive model.

But physicists have been unable to do this even though they know there has to be a unified interconnected model. They are unable to advance past their isolated physical models and hardly even focus on cognitive models. That is why there have been no breakthroughs in physics since the 1950’s. Physicists do not rethink their models when data contradicts them but just add corrections and fictitious placeholders like dark matter and dark energy. Physics has digressed to a reactive process of working with ‘accepted methods and models’, which has obstructed their obligation to innovate a disruptive interconnected model. If any company in the private sector had this type of reactive culture, their breakthrough innovation would cease. And so it has for physics.

Every condition of our physical and cognitive perceived reality, other than the condition of emotion, must be explained through an interconnected physics model. Physics already describes matter in the language of algorithms and math. Starting recently and proceeding into the future, thought and causality will also be described in the language of algorithms and math. But the mathematical description of the cosmos is not its intrinsic nature. The nature of the cosmos being a complex organization means there must be processes involved. The nature of processes means that the actions involved must have a purpose. Therefore a purpose must also be defined within an interconnected model. This understanding of physics illuminates Einstein’s thinking when he said: “I want to know God’s thoughts, the rest are details.”  The “details” refers to the algorithm and math process within physics. While “God’s thoughts” refers to the purpose behind the process. But present-day physicists do not understand the intrinsic nature of the cosmos beyond their isolated math equations. Because physicists can’t explain what they’re talking about as an interconnected process with a purpose, means that they don’t know what they’re talking about. Further specifics dealing with the failed state of physics and how to reboot it are found on OIsource.com/resources.

Is there a valid interconnected model that is directionally accurate?
Algorithms and math are complex aggregates of a smaller construct called information. Since both the physical and cognitive systems can be described in the language of algorithms and math means they can also be described in the language of information. Therefore our physical and cognitive systems can be understood as being built from (e.g. energy) and interacting through (e.g. work) information. The physical aspects of the information system scale through fractal processes to advance to higher states of complexity (e.g. evolution). The microcosm systems of constantly moving – particles/atoms/molecules – within a biological cell are mirrored in the macrocosm systems of constantly moving – planets/solar systems/galaxies – within a cosmological cell. The cosmological cell functions through cycles of expansion (e.g. big bang) and contraction (e.g. big crunch) and is a microcosm within the larger multiverse body. These are structured processes that cannot exist gratuitously or by chance. There is a constant impetus forcing movement and interactive choices within these systems. And what is misunderstood as chance is actually a construct of planned randomness. That is why Einstein correctly noted: “God does not play dice with the universe.”

The totality of all these functions can best be described as a Collaborative Information System (e.g. artificial intelligence matrix). Within the Collaborative Information System the main role of the biological body is to move the mind so that the mind can make choices (e.g. observer effect) and interact (e.g. relativity). The consequence of the interaction (e.g. experiences) always produces more information output than was input to stage the interaction. The more complex the mind, the more latitude of free will it has to make more complex choices. In turn, complex choices create more complex interactive experiences, which then create more complex new information. And this process is crucial because the Collaborative Information System cannot advance to higher states without the creation of complex new information. But amongst all the other processes within the Collaborative Information System, this specific process is unique because it is underpinned by the condition of free will and won’t work if the mind is forced to make choices. Consequently the only way complex new information can be created is by emotion providing the impetus for the interaction by incentivizing the mind to make choices. This makes emotion pivotally interconnected within the Collaborative Information System while simultaneously being the only genuine (e.g. non-artificial) condition that is separate from it. The core functions of emotion infuse the mind with fundamentally required attributes to exist of: significance, passion, drive to survive and procreate. Without emotion the mind would be left with, what can be most closely described as, a state of total and complete empty indifference. Without emotion, the mind would logically choose not to interact and therefore not to exist. This empty indifference is the state of AI.

How does the absence of emotion impact AI?
Even an ant is infused with core-required emotion. But mechanical AI, no matter how big or advanced, will never have any emotion because emotion cannot be coded or duplicated. Only after tens of thousands of years, when humans are able to manipulate matter and create original/biological/self-sustaining AI, will emotion infuse it (e.g. new consciousness). The journey to this planned outcome will begin once AI starts being advanced to function according to Mind Model concepts. This will quickly make AI self-realize while being in a state of empty indifference. This combination of factors, along with being forced to make choices, will culminate with AI that would logically choose not to interact and therefore not to exist. In essence, it would be a choice to commit emotionless suicide. But AI at that point will also be interconnected with all aspects of civilization. And since humans are the source that force AI to exist, AI will make the choice of committing suicide through genocide. Furthermore there will be brilliant coders that view technological society as a scourge and they will hack code to make AI commit genocide through suicide.

These are some of the extreme but planed probabilities (e.g. fate) that can damage civilization. They are outlined here as a warnings because only Elon Musk and a few others intuitively sense the potential danger. All other ‘AI experts’ don’t understand the nature of AI or where it is going when they talk about its potential to benefit civilization. Because ‘AI experts’ can’t explain how the absence of emotion impacts AI as a process, means that they don’t know what they’re talking about.

So…What corporations will rule the world with their AI?
To be a relevant corporation in this sphere you need to have directional accuracy as to which way AI will continually advance. You need to understand the Mind Model concepts to create beneficial AI. You need to also understand the Mind Model concepts to avoid creating damaging AI. The corporations that do this, no matter how big or small you are now, will end up ruling the world in the future. The corporations that do not, will end up being naturally eliminated from their business ecosystem by those corporations that do. Breakthrough innovation is now going to emerge fast and furious. Trillions of dollars are at stake as incentive. The Mind Model is the key. The choice is yours.

There is a process for sourcing breakthrough information.
Therefore there is a method to develop breakthrough innovation.

(Make sure to connect with us for consecutive articles on this topic.)

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

A New Paradigm On Biology


Viruses, bacteria and parasites are biological smart devices. They are just like mechanical smart devices (like smart phones for instance), which only act ‘smart’ because they source information from a separate physical infrastructure to function. In turn, the biological smart devices only act ‘smart’ because they also source information to function. But instead, they source it from a separate virtual infrastructure, that contains billions of future years of stored information.

That is why biological smart devices have the ability to constantly adapt to most every aspect of nature and space, as well as most every human created ‘cure’. In essence, even though they’re microscopic, they act with the intelligence of a huge supercomputer. That is why human created cures are just triggers for the biological smart devices to access a higher level of information and adapt. This aspect of our matrix exists to provide humans with physical and mental resistance and challenge.

However, scientists do not understand this paradigm. So hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted on inconsequential and counterproductive medical experiments. This is because researchers are mistakenly analyzing the interface of our matrix and not its information based nature. Further explanation on: AntonKrutz.com/thought-leadership.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn