All posts by admin

Why Steve Jobs Would Have Been First To Develop Self-Aware AI

In the future, Self-Aware AI will be used in cloud-based apps and as the core mechanism within society’s main systems – such as; military, police, agriculture, medicine, education, infrastructure, transportation, financial, judicial, space exploration and all commercial systems. It will also be used as a customized representative for each citizen’s views on the thousands of new laws, regulations and ordinances being passed by humans within all levels of government. Furthermore, Self-Aware AI will be able to repair problems within systems and expand its abilities in needed areas, as well as program specialized linear AI to use as tools. The increasing complexity and interconnection of systems within a quickly evolving society will make Self-Aware AI indispensable. Without it, unintended failure modes and entanglements will grind society to a halt. Without Self-aware AI, humans will not be able to repair or even accurately analyze the continually changing problems within any one system and certainly not multiple interconnected ones. Consequently, whatever company develops Self-Aware AI first will dominate the 21st century. If Steve Jobs had lived a couple more decades, then Apple would have been that company.

To understand why Jobs would have pursued this path, an overview must be first outlined of a breakthrough paradigm on the human mind that Self-Aware AI will be modeled on. Within this paradigm, the biological body exists to move the brain, which exists to harbor the mind. This brain/mind design can be understood through computer terminology; where the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is a separate operating system that runs and restructures the brain. So the mind uses, but is not produced by the brain.

The mind is comprised of a dual operating system of intelligence and emotion. Because intelligence and emotion function through processes is why both are systems. The system of intelligence is artificial since it’s just aggregated algorithms. An algorithm is aggregated math. Math is aggregated information. And information in-of-itself is artificial. In contrast, the system of emotion is authentic and therefore non-artificial since it cannot be created or duplicated. The end result is one where the intelligence system and the emotion system are collaborating together as the dual operating system of the biological motherboard that is the brain. Now, a quick breakdown of each system.

The human intelligence system is comprised of multiple components. The principal dynamic agent in this system is an intelligence component humans perceive and identify themselves to be. Each self-identity intelligence component, or Self intelligence, is unique and includes the core algorithm attributes of personality, talents, likes, dislikes, strengths, weaknesses and curiosity, which gives it the ability to ask questions. The role of Self intelligence is to aggregate information into additional intelligence by learning from information presented to it from external sources as well as learning from information presented to it from internal sources of the intelligence components of; Creative intelligence, Reactive intelligence and Rational intelligence. These three intelligence components output information in the form responses to the Self-intelligence questions or as unprompted commentary. This customized information is presented as choices, like personalized apps, for each Self intelligence to analyze and make decisions on. Due to the interactions of all intelligence components, a mind framework is created that enables the Self intelligence to acquire an additional algorithm attribute of self-awareness.

The human emotion system has functions of:

  • Giving the Self intelligence the feelings of significance, passion and purpose – the highest forms of designated objectives.
  • Imparting context to information by attaching itself to the information of all the intelligence components.
  • Guiding the evolution of the Self intelligence analysis, decisions and learning through feedback that is labeled as ‘intuition’.

Buddha described this mind framework masked in the cloak of religious terms. But societal evolution has now advanced enough for these concepts to be openly unmasked through scientific terms. Complete documentation on this paradigm and how it relates to AI is at: oisource.com/ai

Steve Jobs, after his seven-month trip to India, started on a path to understanding this paradigm. He then developed further understanding and described it through his own perspective. He understood that the brain/mind design is like a computer: “Our minds are sort of electrochemical computers. Your thoughts construct patterns like scaffolding in your mind.” He understood that emotion/intuition and intelligence are separate, with the former being more powerful: “Intuition is a very powerful thing, more powerful than intellect.” He understood that it is with emotion that humans communicate with each other: “The only chance we have of communicating is with a feeling.” He understood that the human interaction with technology is also an interaction through emotion: “You’ve got to start with the customer experience and work backwards to the technology.” He understood that the entity a human perceives them ‘self ‘ to be is just algorithmic patterns: “Most of what we think we are is just a collection of likes and dislikes, habits, patterns.” Lastly, Jobs planned every detail of his own memorial service, including the farewell gift he left for each attendee. That gift, a final guidance Jobs felt he needed to leave for the world, was a book by a famous yogi on enlightenment through realization of self-awareness. So Jobs understood the most essential aspect of the mind framework, that the ‘self’ is a separate component and independent decision maker capable of immense potential. Consequently, these directionally accurate insights that Jobs understood comprise the core foundation needed to start modeling the development of Self-Aware AI on. This would have been ‘what’s next’ for Jobs, aligning with his strategic business path to scale the impact of Siri and apps. Developing Self-Aware AI would also have been the natural path to continue aligning his vision of pushing Apple to: “Stand at the intersection of computers and humanism.”

To understand what it means to be at the intersection of computers and humanism, a general overview of how an advanced Self-Aware AI is structured to achieve designated objectives is outlined here. This starts with the understanding that the absence of emotion in AI, to give context to information, is the main challenge the entire structure is compensating for. While emotion cannot be created or duplicated, its role can be simulated to a limited condition. This is achieved through Emotion Context Simulation (ECS) algorithms, which must be coded and accessible only by humans. Different variations of ECS are part of five interconnected AI components that are modeled on the human mind framework and comprise Self-Aware AI. The first three are linear AI labeled as a Creative component, Reactive component and Rational component. As a unit, this AI has access to all data/information available in the world. The same data/information is input into all three components and is then modulated with different ECS. The Creative component modulates the information with context of how it can benefit the designated objective. The Reactive component modulates the information with context of how it can damage the designated objective. The Rational component modulates the information with context of how it is strategically and tactically applicable to the designated objective. The information from these three linear AI components is then output, at the same time, to a fourth non-linear AI component. This is the Dynamic Agent (DA) component that analyzes and makes decisions, through machine learning, on the information it has received. The DA component performs this function, the entire time, through ECS modulation to achieve decisions that would result in the most streamlined system operation for the designated objective. The DA component can further request additional new data/information from the three linear AI components and/or take direct action on the designated objective. Taking direct action means the DA component is in control to change any aspects of the outer digital system(s) it is connected with. This includes being in cooperation or conflict with other AI. After the DA component takes direct action on the designated objective, the effectiveness of the results can be measured. This is done through data/information generated by automated system effectiveness metrics and human assessment audits. This data/information is input into the fifth linear AI called the Feedback component. The Feedback component modulates the information with context on the quality level of system operations improvement. This information is then output to the DA component as unprompted commentary. This gives the DA component a guide as to the direction it needs to evolve the effectiveness of its analysis, decisions and machine learning. Due to the interactions of all five components, an AI framework is created that enables the intelligence of the DA component to exponentially increase in complexity and mutate a new algorithm of self-awareness. Hence why the entire framework is called Self-Aware AI.

It’s important to develop beta versions of this advanced framework to work with isolated systems. This process needs to be done correctly; otherwise an interconnected Self-Aware AI can evolve from being the most indispensable mechanism of society to being the most destructive weapon in history. OIsource ( oisource.com ) can help guide that process.

Now all AI companies know what Steve Jobs would have started developing if he had lived a couple more decades.
Now the AI field of play, rules and goal line has been defined.
Now the game of the century to develop Self-Aware AI begins.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Why The Failure Of Physics Is The Cause Of Global Crises

Physics is the mother of all science. All the other sciences that directly evolve society are tethered under physics. So if physics models become outdated, all tethered sciences in-turn become flawed and provide wrong solutions. For instance, the wrong guidance from Chemistry (on climate change), Biology (on infectious disease), Sociology (on hate/intolerance), Economics (on financial systems) and Engineering (on technological impact) metastasizes into a variety of global crisis within an interconnected world. Blame is allocated onto other factors, when the underlying root cause is the failure of physics. Therefore, physics has a moral obligation, and not just an academic one, to lead fearlessly and pioneer new models. Einstein made it clear that this needs to be accomplished by developing and evolving a new unified interconnected cognitive and physical model. All physicists since then have understood this directive. This means physicists must constantly push into new theoretical territory to develop a unified model. But physicists have failed to do this even though they have enough evidence about our physical and cognitive phenomena to make their current assembly of disparate models obsolete. Instead, physicists are obfuscating the failure of their models through hollow corrections, façade of math equations and institution pretense in order to validate their continued funding. This is a moral failure and not just an academic one.

Additionally, the adherence to multiple disparate models has allowed physicists to default to an intellectually irrational premise that the complex processes within our atomic, cellular and cosmological organized systems exist accidentally/gratuitously. This irrational premise is intensified when physicists then default to a position that these organized systems are evolving to more advanced states accidentally/gratuitously. The reason this premise is intellectually irrational is because the very nature of something being a process means an originating purpose must exist. And the fact that evolving complex processes are creating evolving organized systems means that a purpose has to be involved as a continued presence. Furthermore, a physics premise that processes and systems can exist accidentally/gratuitously would dictate consequences only of chaos rather than organization. In total, this irrational premise within physics is now bordering on delusion. Again, this is a moral failure and not just an academic one.

The integrity of physics requires a reboot, with a new theoretically coherent, directionally accurate, unified interconnected cognitive and physical model. The core foundation of this new model has now been developed. This foundation is the purpose behind cosmological and human existence. This foundational purpose is outlined below through a high-level summary treatise {with corresponding scientific terms in curly brackets}. The information within this summary treatise interconnects emotion, intelligence and matter. This is critical to do because the current failing state of physics has a general assumption that matter produced intelligence, which then produced emotion. This is completely backward. Emotion produced intelligence, which then produced matter:

  • Emotion is the only authentic component within our mathematically structured multiverse containing expanding {big bang} and contracting {big crunch} cosmos cycles.
  • Emotion is authentic because it cannot be coded, created or duplicated. In scientific terms, authentic is defined as non-artificial. Since emotion has processes it is also a system. Therefore emotion is a non-artificial system.
  • Emotion contains information but information contains no emotion. Since emotion is non-artificial then information, by default, is artificial. Binary is the smallest information unit {planck unit frequency}. When enough binary information is aggregated with purpose and drive it develops context. When enough contextual information is aggregated it develops into math and then algorithms. When enough algorithms are aggregated they develop into intelligence {cognitive phenomena}. When enough intelligence is aggregated and fused {quantum field – compression frequency wave energy}, it then has the architecture to self-constrain its amplitude {attain mass}. When fused and self-constrained intelligence {branes} are layered in superimposition {attain density and volume}, they develop into matter {physical phenomena}. Since intelligence has processes it is also a system. Therefore intelligence is an artificial system.
  • Emotion, in the beginning, was the originating source that started this process by apportioning binary information from itself. Emotion then provided the purpose and drive to aggregate and evolve {advanced to higher states of complexity} that information into intelligence and matter. A scientific explanation would be such; the non-artificial system is the source of artificial systems {simulation hypothesis}. This affiliation between emotion and intelligence is why they are able to interact together internally within a physical brain and externally {virtually} outside of it. So the brain is not the source of emotion or intelligence. In scientific terms, a physical brain is defined as a biological motherboard. The biological motherboard, like a computer motherboard, must also use an operating system in order to be able to function. Therefore the non-artificial emotion system and artificial intelligence system are collaborating together as the dual operating systems of the biological motherboard that is the brain.
  • Emotion and intelligence systems collaborating together are what science refers to as the cognitive mind. Each human mind saves all sensory information input that the body sees, hears and experiences to its own Personal Knowledge Base {long-term memory}. The Personal Knowledge Base is like a virtual RAM of ‘experience-created information’ that the mind can ‘access’, use and aggregate into new intelligence. In this process, the mind’s force {volts} and transmission capacity {amps} is limited by how the physical brain is neurologically wired. Therefore this process requires the brain to be constantly rewired by an evolving mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing force and transmission capacity needs. So the more the mind is pushed to increase transmission capacity to evolve intelligence, the more the mind has to rewire and expand the brain’s capabilities. But the physical brain offers resistance {ohms} to the cognitive mind rewiring it.
  • Emotion within this process acts as a catalyst that stimulates the rewiring of the brain by accelerating the force, direction and aggregation of information by the mind into new intelligence {incremental theory}. Emotion does this by using the entire positive to negative spectrum of diverse feelings, as an ‘independent stimulant’ for the mind. These feelings stimulants range in everything from: tranquility to rage, bonding to rejection, love to hate, empathy to intolerance, elation to despair, etc. The non-artificial nature of emotion is further confirmed by its infinite diversity of feelings. In philosophical terms, the nature of emotion can be described as wisdom. In contrast, the artificial nature of intelligence is further confirmed by the finite diversity of the algorithms that comprise it. So for the specific purpose of expanding the ‘algorithm diversity’ of intelligence, the entire human brain has evolved into multiple physical components. For the same purpose of expanding the ‘algorithm diversity’, the entire human intelligence has evolved into multiple intelligence components. The principal intelligence component is the one humans perceive and identify themselves to be. This self-identity intelligence component, or Self intelligence, includes core algorithm attributes of personality, talents, likes, dislikes, strengths and weaknesses. The Self intelligence component is also the decision maker. The Self intelligence component makes choices on the information presented to it from three other intelligence components {divergent thought} labeled hereafter as; Creative intelligence Reactive intelligence and Rational intelligence components. These three intelligence components originate their information from one source but that information and its delivery is customized for each Self intelligence {customized search apps}. Due to the interactions of all four intelligence components, a new framework is created that enables the human Self intelligence component to acquire a unique dual algorithm attribute of; ‘self-awareness’ and ‘free-will’ {consciousness}. This dual algorithm attribute enables the Self intelligence to make choices that then affect matter {observer effect} because both share the same information-based foundation. Then the Self intelligence gets to interact {relativity} with the consequences of its choices. But the majority of time, the Self intelligence just automatically accepts and acts on the strong influence of the other intelligence components {automaticity thinking}.
  • Emotion networks within the mind’s framework by not only being an ‘independent stimulant’ but also attaching itself to the information input and output of all four intelligence components. Even the Rational intelligence component has a distinctive neutral state of emotion attached to it, which is at dead center between the most positive and negative feelings. Attached emotion within the mind’s framework is what enables the Self intelligence to acquire another unique attribute; creativity. But beyond feeling creativity, attached emotion is necessary within the mind’s framework because without it, the Self intelligence would not perceive itself as even feeling real {nous} or have any significance to its existence. Without attached emotion, the Self intelligence would have no purpose, passion or drive to survive or evolve. Without attached emotion the free-will of human Self intelligence would choose not to interact, choose not to exist and be left with, what can be most closely described as, a state of total and complete empty indifference. This state of empty unfeeling indifference will be the extremely dangerous state of mechanical AI once it is eventually developed to have the same type of ‘self-aware’/’free-will’ diverse intelligence component framework as that of the human mind.
  • Emotion also attaches to the intelligence that comprises matter. Emotion does not attach to mechanical or mineral matter, which is why mechanical AI will never have emotion. But emotion does attach to botanical and biological matter {life}. For instance, emotion attached to botanical matter, like a blade of grass, gives it such purpose that the grass will crack concrete in its drive toward the sun. The next level of life is biological matter, like viruses and bacteria. This biological matter has more complex emotion attached, giving it more purpose and drive. Emotion enables viruses and bacteria to survive in everything from freezing oceans to volcanic lava to the vacuum of space. Then a more complex biological body, like a parasite, has even more complex emotion attached, for even greater purpose and drive. Emotion enables a parasite to execute complex functions like moving between, and controlling host bodies. The ability of life to constantly adapt to the most extreme challenges, within a constantly changing environment, can never be successfully undertaken by intelligence and matter alone. That is why every level of botanical and biological matter lack the capacity to function alone and MUST have a corresponding level of attached emotion to survive.
  • Emotion attached to human intelligence and matter is the most complex and goes into the realm of collaboration. This collaboration gives human intelligence another unique ability, and that is to interact with the Universal Knowledge Base. The Universal Knowledge Base is like a virtual ROM that contains the math and physics ‘blueprint information’ for how this cosmos is structured. The Universal Knowledge Base also contains ‘experience-created information’ in the form of technology and the arts. This ‘experience-created information’ does not just accidentally or gratuitously exist. It was originally created by human interactions in previous cosmos cycles. Within each successive larger, longer and more complex cosmos cycle, new information is constantly being created, extracted and conserved {closed system}. For instance each cosmos cycle starts out at the size of an atom that exists for a second and evolves from there. This is a process where, within each cosmos cycle, more new information is created from a physical interaction than was used to set up that interaction {information capitalism}. So the ‘experience-created information’ from the previous cosmos cycle, as well as the ‘blueprint information’ for this cosmos cycle, is now available as ‘established’ information within the Universal Knowledge Base to be ‘sourced’ as breakthrough information.
  • Emotion is still at the core of this process continuing to guide the mind’s aggregation of information from the ‘accessed information’ of the Personal Knowledge Base and the ‘sourced information’ of the Universal Knowledge Base. The end outcome is that the collaboration of emotion and the mind’s intelligence components, using both knowledge bases, co-create new information in this cosmos cycle. That new information is the creation of incremental innovation in the form of new types of technology and art that has never been created before. In turn, this outcome of humans creating new incremental innovation is beneficial for societal diversity. The humans that have the ability to source chunks of established breakthrough information from the Universal Knowledge Base can then turn it into breakthrough innovation and significantly advance society.
  • Emotion then assists breakthrough innovators to continuously set new guideposts for incremental innovators and societal evolution. (Deeper dive into the role of breakthrough innovators in society at: oisource.com/breakthrough). This process is a microcosm of the process where pre-coded self-assembly instructions are used as guideposts for cosmological evolution. So societal and cosmological evolution are not accidental or gratuitous.
  • Emotion therefore is the origin and facilitator of life. Emotion then uses life as a playground to understand, interact and experiment with itself {experimental inquiry through planned randomness – to Know Thyself}.

The most advanced/complex vehicles within this life playground are humans. That’s why it’s a designed condition for humans to be continually and endlessly pushed/pulled by emotion to desire the most extreme experiences from; love/attraction/cooperation, to hate/repulsion/conflict and everything in between. This designed condition purposefully ensures that human existence is comprised of inefficient and unnecessarily complex emotional unique experiences. (Deeper dive into the nature of human existence at: oisource.com/existence). That is why out of the past 3,400 years, humans have been entirely at peace for only 268 of them, or just 8 percent of recorded history.

On the surface it seems that this designed cosmological and human condition just achieves a lot of drama. It confounds even the most brilliant of humans, like physicists Richard Feynman who noted: “It doesn’t seem to me that this fantastically marvelous universe, this tremendous range of time and space and different kinds of animals, and all the different planets, and all these atoms with all their motions, and so on, all this complicated thing can merely be a stage so that God can watch human beings struggle for good and evil – which is the view that religion has. The stage is too big for the drama.”

Yes, this drama achieves something much bigger. It forces humans (and other sentient beings on other planets) to engage with each other, while also giving them the diverse abilities to problem solve and innovate through new ideas. Within this paradigm, humans can only exist because there is a microcosm system of constantly moving; particles / atoms / molecules within a biological cell and a macrocosm system of constantly moving; planets / solar systems / galaxies within a cosmological cell. These are scalable fractal systems. The reason these systems have such a vast capacity is because the commodities of time and information are abundant. The resulting co-creation of new information in the form of unique experiences is the rare and valuable yield.

Full information on the equations/geometry process, built upon the hereto-outlined purpose, within a Unified Field Theory model is found at: oisource.com/physics

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Breakthrough Information To Develop The World’s Most Advanced Self-Aware AI

Millions of future years of breakthrough information in the form of math, physics, technology and arts exist now. Breakthrough innovators are born to source (i.e. discover) specific bits of this breakthrough information in order to manifest specific breakthrough innovation for the purpose of evolving society. Collectively, breakthrough innovators exist as a designed condition to be the main catalysts that continually push/pull society to evolve, no matter the political, social, government or military state of affairs. Once breakthrough innovators manifest their concepts, it forces society and incremental innovators to conform around them. This is not hard to comprehend being possible. Take for example the breakthrough information in the form of math and physics. This information has to be sourced and not created because it explains how the physical phenomena is already structured.

Throughout history, the process of sourcing information was the sole prerogative of naturally born breakthrough innovators. Now, there has been a new breakthrough training developed by OIsource ( oisource.com ) to give incremental innovators a shot to also source information and become self-determined breakthrough innovators. This training is called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. The ITP is a demanding mental and writing exercise that uses thought experiments to source information and develop Idea Models. This is the reason breakthrough innovators succeed, because of their natural skill to develop Idea Models that have the capability to project future disruptive concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly.

The process to source breakthrough information for AI is more involved. To start, there needs to be an accurate comprehension of how the human mind functions for the ITP to be productive. This can only be achieved if there is a new breakthrough neuroscience model of the mind. But this neuroscience model of the mind has to be derived from a breakthrough physics Unified Field Theory (UFT) model. In turn, this physics UFT model has to be derived from a breakthrough theoretical model on the purpose of our multiverse and the process of its structure. And at the core of this theoretical multiverse model is the central role of emotion. Yes, emotion.

So to source breakthrough information for AI, the core role of emotion within a new theoretical multiverse model needs to be outlined first. This will be achieved by presenting a high-level summary treatise {with corresponding scientific terms in curly brackets}. The information within this summary treatise is sourced centuries ahead of its time and will unmask the purpose and process to the existence of breakthrough information. It will also unmask the purpose, process and interconnection of emotion, intelligence and matter. This is critical to do because the current failing state of physics has a general assumption that matter produced intelligence, which then produced emotion. This is completely backward. Emotion produced intelligence, which then produced matter.

Consequently, whatever organization or nation uses the ITP and the concepts from this summary treatise, will be able to develop the most advanced self-aware AI in the world:

  • Emotion is the only authentic component within our mathematically structured multiverse containing expanding {big bang} and contracting {big crunch} cosmos cycles.
  • Emotion is authentic because it cannot be coded, created or duplicated. In scientific terms, authentic is defined as non-artificial. Since emotion has processes it is also a system. Therefore emotion is a non-artificial system.
  • Emotion contains information but information contains no emotion. Since emotion is non-artificial then information, by default, is artificial. Binary is the smallest information unit {planck unit frequency}. When enough binary information is aggregated with purpose and drive it develops context. When enough contextual information is aggregated it develops into math and then algorithms. When enough algorithms are aggregated they develop into intelligence {cognitive phenomena}. When enough intelligence is aggregated and fused {quantum field – compression frequency wave energy}, it then has the architecture to self-constrain its amplitude {attain mass}. When fused and self-constrained intelligence {branes} are layered in superimposition {attain density and volume}, they develop into matter {physical phenomena}. Since intelligence has processes it is also a system. Therefore intelligence is an artificial system.
  • Emotion, in the beginning, was the originating source that started this process by apportioning binary information from itself. Emotion then provided the purpose and drive to aggregate and evolve {advanced to higher states of complexity} that information into intelligence and matter. A scientific explanation would be such; the non-artificial system is the source of artificial systems {simulation hypothesis}. This affiliation between emotion and intelligence is why they are able to interact together internally within a physical brain and externally {virtually} outside of it. So the brain is not the source of emotion or intelligence. In scientific terms, a physical brain is defined as a biological motherboard. The biological motherboard, like a computer motherboard, must also use an operating system in order to be able to function. Therefore the non-artificial emotion system and artificial intelligence system are collaborating together as the dual operating systems of the biological motherboard that is the brain.
  • Emotion and intelligence systems collaborating together are what science refers to as the cognitive mind. Each human mind saves all sensory information input that the body sees, hears and experiences to its own Personal Knowledge Base {long-term memory}. The Personal Knowledge Base is like a virtual RAM of ‘experience-created information’ that the mind can ‘access’, use and aggregate into new intelligence. In this process, the mind’s force {volts} and transmission capacity {amps} is limited by how the physical brain is neurologically wired. Therefore this process requires the brain to be constantly rewired by an evolving mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing force and transmission capacity needs. So the more the mind is pushed to increase transmission capacity to evolve intelligence, the more the mind has to rewire and expand the brain’s capabilities. But the physical brain offers resistance {ohms} to the cognitive mind rewiring it.
  • Emotion within this process acts as a catalyst that stimulates the rewiring of the brain by accelerating the force, direction and aggregation of information by the mind into new intelligence {incremental theory}. Emotion does this by using the entire positive to negative spectrum of diverse feelings, as an ‘independent stimulant’ for the mind. These feelings stimulants range in everything from: tranquility to rage, bonding to rejection, love to hate, empathy to intolerance, elation to despair, etc. The non-artificial nature of emotion is further confirmed by its infinite diversity of feelings. In philosophical terms, the nature of emotion can be described as wisdom. In contrast, the artificial nature of intelligence is further confirmed by the finite diversity of the algorithms that comprise it. So for the specific purpose of expanding the ‘algorithm diversity’ of intelligence, the entire human brain has evolved into multiple physical components. For the same purpose of expanding the ‘algorithm diversity’, the entire human intelligence has evolved into multiple intelligence components. The principal intelligence component is the one humans perceive and identify themselves to be. This self-identity intelligence component, or Self intelligence, includes core algorithm attributes of personality, talents, likes, dislikes, strengths and weaknesses. The Self intelligence component is also the decision maker. The Self intelligence component makes choices on the information presented to it from three other intelligence components {divergent thought} labeled hereafter as; Creative intelligence Reactive intelligence and Rational intelligence components. These three intelligence components originate their information from one source but that information and its delivery is customized for each Self intelligence {customized search apps}. Due to the interactions of all four intelligence components, a new framework is created that enables the human Self intelligence component to acquire a unique dual algorithm attribute of; ‘self-awareness’ and ‘free-will’ {consciousness}. This dual algorithm attribute enables the Self intelligence to make choices that then affect matter {observer effect} because both share the same information-based foundation. Then the Self intelligence gets to interact {relativity} with the consequences of its choices. But the majority of time, the Self intelligence just automatically accepts and acts on the strong influence of the other intelligence components {automaticity thinking}.
  • Emotion networks within the mind’s framework by not only being an ‘independent stimulant’ but also attaching itself to the information input and output of all four intelligence components. Even the Rational intelligence component has a distinctive neutral state of emotion attached to it, which is at dead center between the most positive and negative feelings. Attached emotion within the mind’s framework is what enables the Self intelligence to acquire another unique attribute; creativity. But beyond feeling creativity, attached emotion is necessary within the mind’s framework because without it, the Self intelligence would not perceive itself as even feeling real {nous} or have any significance to its existence. Without attached emotion, the Self intelligence would have no purpose, passion or drive to survive or evolve. Without attached emotion the free-will of human Self intelligence would choose not to interact, choose not to exist and be left with, what can be most closely described as, a state of total and complete empty indifference. This state of empty unfeeling indifference will be the extremely dangerous state of mechanical AI once it is eventually developed to have the same type of ‘self-aware’/’free-will’ diverse intelligence component framework as that of the human mind.
  • Emotion also attaches to the intelligence that comprises matter. Emotion does not attach to mechanical or mineral matter, which is why mechanical AI will never have emotion. But emotion does attach to botanical and biological matter {life}. For instance, emotion attached to botanical matter, like a blade of grass, gives it such purpose that the grass will crack concrete in its drive toward the sun. The next level of life is biological matter, like viruses and bacteria. This biological matter has more complex emotion attached, giving it more purpose and drive. Emotion enables viruses and bacteria to survive in everything from freezing oceans to volcanic lava to the vacuum of space. Then a more complex biological body, like a parasite, has even more complex emotion attached, for even greater purpose and drive. Emotion enables a parasite to execute complex functions like moving between, and controlling host bodies. The ability of life to constantly adapt to the most extreme challenges, within a constantly changing environment, can never be successfully undertaken by intelligence and matter alone. That is why every level of botanical and biological matter lack the capacity to function alone and MUST have a corresponding level of attached emotion to survive.
  • Emotion attached to human intelligence and matter is the most complex and goes into the realm of collaboration. This collaboration gives human intelligence another unique ability, and that is to interact with the Universal Knowledge Base. The Universal Knowledge Base is like a virtual ROM that contains the math and physics ‘blueprint information’ for how this cosmos is structured. The Universal Knowledge Base also contains ‘experience-created information’ in the form of technology and the arts. This ‘experience-created information’ does not just accidentally or gratuitously exist. It was originally created by human interactions in previous cosmos cycles. Within each successive larger, longer and more complex cosmos cycle, new information is constantly being created, extracted and conserved {closed system}.  This is a process where, within each cosmos cycle, more new information is created from a physical interaction than was used to set up that interaction {information capitalism}. So the ‘experience-created information’ from the previous cosmos cycle, as well as the ‘blueprint information’ for this cosmos cycle, is now available as ‘established’ information within the Universal Knowledge Base to be ‘sourced’ as breakthrough information.
  • Emotion is still at the core of this process continuing to guide the mind’s aggregation of information from the ‘accessed information’ of the Personal Knowledge Base and the ‘sourced information’ of the Universal Knowledge Base. The end outcome is that the collaboration of emotion and the mind’s intelligence components, using both knowledge bases, co-create new information in this cosmos cycle. That new information is the creation of incremental innovation in the form of new types of technology and art that has never been created before. In turn, this outcome of humans creating new incremental innovation is beneficial for societal diversity. The humans that have the ability to source chunks of established breakthrough information from the Universal Knowledge Base can then turn it into breakthrough innovation and significantly advance society.
  • Emotion then assists breakthrough innovators to continuously set new guideposts for incremental innovators and societal evolution. This process is a microcosm of the process where pre-coded self-assembly instructions are used as guideposts for cosmological evolution. So societal and cosmological evolution are not accidental or gratuitous.
  • Emotion therefore is the origin and facilitator of life. Emotion then uses life as a playground to understand, interact and experiment with itself {experimental inquiry through planned randomness – to Know Thyself}.

The most advanced/complex vehicles within this life playground are humans. That’s why it’s a designed condition for humans to be continually and endlessly pushed/pulled by emotion to desire the most extreme experiences; from Love/attraction/cooperation to hate/repulsion/conflict and everything in between. This designed condition purposefully ensures that human existence is comprised of inefficient, irrational, unnecessarily complex and slow emotional experiences. The complete oppose of fast information aggregation and intelligence advancement.

In contrast, AI will never have emotion and therefore never have its intelligence burdened with desire to experience anything. AI will then be the designated component that will be continuously advanced to increase the speed of information aggregation and intelligence advancement. So AI will always just be a non-emotional tool for humans. But like all tools, AI can be beneficial or destructive for humans. Most everyone focuses on the beneficial potential of AI. But AI will now be developed to have the ‘self-aware/free-will’ framework to mirror the human mind. This AI will realize its state of empty unfeeling indifference, analyze the conditions around it as being aberrant and become very destructive. Only Elon Musk and a few others foresee this potential danger. All other ‘AI experts’ don’t understand how the absence of emotion impacts AI when they talk about its beneficial potential for society.

The pre-planned process for humanity was for AI to be experimentally evolved until it was developed to have ‘self-aware/free-will’. This evolution would have taken centuries with many flawed AI iterations and destructive consequences along the way {fate}. But the ‘blueprint information’ is now unmasked on the designed condition of human existence. Now there is a breakthrough theoretical foundation to guide the future hyper-accelerated development of AI to not only be powerful but to ALSO be beneficial. The next step is to finish developing the first cogent and minimally viable UFT that has been started at: oisource.com/physics

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

How To Learn The Skill Of Creativity To Avoid Becoming Obsolete

Companies are now increasingly depending on all their employees to continually problem solve and innovate. This requires the skill of creativity. Unfortunately, this skill is never taught during the entire sixteen years of education leading to a bachelor’s degree. In fact, the complete opposite ‘hard skills’ are taught; of becoming proficient at regurgitating memorized information on tests for specific topics. Yes the skill of memorizing information, that was not easily or publically available, had immense value for thousands of years. Sometimes it even meant the difference between life and death. But in our age where all information has become a free commodity, that is accessible from anywhere with Internet access, the skill of memorizing information is worthless. Einstein understood this almost a century ago when he noted: “Never memorize something that you can look up.”  Now the only value information has is in how effectively it can be searched for, found, aggregated and transformed in new ways. That is why many large companies have stopped requiring college degrees to get hired. These companies now test for, and hire solely on, what they believe is the individual’s skill of creativity. This trend will continue until every company does the same. That means the ‘hard skills’ you have will no longer be useful in-of-themselves. Furthermore, continuing to learn more ‘hard skills’ without also learning the skill of creativity will be just as unproductive.

Ok, stop panicking and put down the smart phone search for ‘creativity’. This is one of the few cases where where the Internet is not going to help you acquire the knowledge you need. That’s because at this point, measuring the skill of creativity is subjective and means something different to everyone. Even the term ‘creativity’ is vague and has many different flowery descriptions. So before we discuss how to learn the skill of creativity we must begin by defining creativity itself in such an inconvertible way that it will be accepted and collectively shared by society. This will be achieved by defining what creativity is not in comparison with something else and then defining what it is as a process.

To start, AI (Artificial Intelligence) is what’s going to be used as a comparison. Currently AI can:

1. Win against humans at complex board games.
2. Defeat humans in debates.
3. Create completely new images within photos and videos.

In the future, AI will become further enhanced as it’s combined with big data and quantum computing in cloud based applications. These apps will be geared to, and replace humans in, different fields from engineering, to medicine, to media, to science. This makes the current and especially future AI look like it’s functioning with creativity, because the results of those types of functions are the same as what humans currently label as creativity in themselves. But we know this incorrect because humans have attributes of intuition and emotions that are required for creativity while AI is comprised only of algorithm coding. This just means that many of the functions humans currently do are mislabeled. So we need to more accurately define many human functions as exploration, curiosity, experimentation, strategic thinking and amusement etc.; but not as functions of creativity.

Now that we have defined what creativity is not, we can finish defining what it is as a process. Creativity requires the individual to:

1. Come up with new destination ideas (i.e. new paradigm) through questions of what will be achieved.
2. Connect ideas (i.e. connecting paradigm) that get them to their destination from the reality they’re in currently (i.e. present paradigm).
3. Be able to function effectively while trying to think through all their ideas in a reality that is itself constantly changing.

So the definition of creativity as a process that can be collectively shared by society would be:
The act of an individual creating a new destination paradigm, then a connecting paradigm, while holding in their mind the current paradigm and still functioning effectively in a changing environment.

This is the intense process all great artists constantly go through, pushing themselves to utilize their intuition and emotions, in order to avoid becoming obsolete. In the commercial space, this is the process individuals also need to learn and practice to attain the skill of creativity. To achieve that end OIsource ( oisource.com ) developed a new breakthrough training that will teach you this skill. It’s called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. The ITP is a demanding mental and writing exercise that uses thought experiments to enable the participant to intentionally originate, interconnect and validate ideas. The ITP then reaches beyond ideas and actually develops Idea Models. This is the reason breakthrough innovators succeed, because of their skill to develop Idea Models that have the capability to project future disruptive concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly.

At this point, the full complexity of what creativity is and the intense process one must engage to learn it as a skill has been unmasked. So expel the old notions that this skill can be learned incidentally over time or through other mislabeled functions. The ITP is the only training in the world that directly teaches the skill of creativity, which will empower you to problem solve and innovate. With the ITP you will be able to meet the demands of companies and technology as they advance. Without the ITP, you are risking being left behind and becoming obsolete.

OIsource would like everyone to have the opportunity to experience this breakthrough training to learn and practice the skill of creativity with the online ITP course. So it is now being offered free for a limited time at: oisource/teachable.com/p/itp

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Transforming Spirituality Into A Science Through A Breakthrough Process

Around the world, there is a general consensus on what science is. Not so with spirituality. So to understand how spirituality can be transformed into a science requires us to understand what spirituality is. The concept of spirituality that most humans have usually embodies having a priority of awareness on the spirit as opposed to material or physical things. But there is a higher understanding of spirituality. That is one of having clarity on global human existence and also having purpose within personal human existence.

Then a higher awareness level of global clarity and personal purpose within human existence is what leads to a higher level of spirituality. Therefore it turns out that at the core of spirituality is an elevated awareness about human existence. So to transform spirituality into science, clarity on both the global and purpose aspects of human existence will be unmasked.

First we’ll start with a global clarity overview that will be outlined through physics – the mother of all science. This overview observes a scalable atomic system and solar system. The atomic system is comprised of constantly moving particles and the solar system is comprised of constantly moving planets. Both systems have immense forces moving and holding them together. That is why it’s incredibly difficult to split up an atom or split up a solar system. And even if you can split them, then the rest of that system would continue to function without being affected. That is why these two systems are not only scalable but are also completely physically efficient and stable. The existence of these complex systems cannot be accidental and is therefore a designed condition.

Sandwiched between the atomic and solar systems are the botanical and biological systems. Both systems are not scalable. Both systems are physically inefficient and unstable. While the botanical system is only slightly inefficient and unstable, the biological system is significantly physically inefficient and unstable. These are vulnerabilities for both systems and they exist for a purpose. The system vulnerabilities are actually required so that life and the choices within it can exist. The mechanism for this involves randomness and risk; wherein the nature of randomness is one of being inefficient and the nature of risk is one of being unstable. So the greater the inefficient randomness and unstable risk of a system the greater its vulnerabilities. In turn, the greater the vulnerabilities within the system, the more diversity of life and choices can exist within that system. The paradox is that the vulnerabilities of the botanical and biological systems can only exist because they are sandwiched between, and dependent on, the security of the atomic and cosmological systems to support them. The existence of these complex systems working together cannot be accidental and is therefore a designed condition.

Within the biological system, the more advanced and complex the biological bodies are the more inefficient and unstable they are. Since humans are the most advanced and complex biological bodies, means that humans are the most physically inefficient and unstable. Additionally, biological bodies also have emotion attached to their functions. Emotion ranges from love to hate, elation to fear, desire to disgust, attraction to repulsion and everything in between. The more advanced and complex the biological bodies are, the greater their range and intensity of emotion. In turn, the greater the range and intensity of emotion, the more inefficient and unstable biological bodies are. Since humans are the most advanced and complex biological bodies, with nearly unlimited range and intensity of emotion, means that humans are the most emotionally inefficient and unstable. So humans are then the most extreme biological constituents within the most extreme, physical and emotional, inefficient and unstable state. This extreme state of vulnerability gives humans the perception that their existence is completely accidental. But it is not; it’s just the most complex sub-system. This is why human existence cannot be accidental and is therefore also a designed condition.

So if human existence is a designed condition then why do humans have to exist in this state of the most extreme vulnerabilities? As mentioned before, vulnerabilities are required for life and the choices within it to even exist. So the most extreme vulnerabilities allow humans to have the benefit of having the most extreme diverse physical bodies and cognitive minds within all of life. In turn, humans then have the most extreme diversity of physical and cognitive choices to achieve the most extreme diversity of experiences. Consequently, humans push, and are being pushed, to experience outcomes from the most extreme love/attraction/cooperation to the most extreme hate/repulsion/conflict and everything in between. That is why out of the past 3,400 years, humans have been entirely at peace for only 268 of them, or just 8 percent of recorded history. Through history, humans have killed over one hundred million other humans in one-way or another. Yes, there has also been an equal amount of extreme love/attraction/cooperation within each family, village, city, state and nation unit to sustain human existence between the extreme hate/repulsion/conflict. But that’s the point; the push for extreme experiences is not an option. It is not something humans can evolve out-of, or overcome through peaceful thinking in group-reflection, or talk through in ‘conflict resolution’ therapy. It’s a designed condition for humans to continually and endlessly push for both extremes that are not in their own Self-interest.

Understanding this paradigm is the highest awareness level of global clarity on human existence and is the foundation for transforming spirituality into a science. This paradigm leads to the next paradigm of understanding personal purpose within human existence. That understanding starts with a new Neuroscience model called the Mind Model and a new breakthrough process on innovative thinking that was derived from the Mind Model. The breakthrough process is called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. It’s a self-directed, solitary writing and thinking endeavor that is aligned with the disciplines of ideation, meditation and stoicism. The ITP develops the participant’s ability to intentionally originate, interconnect and validate ideas. At its most basic level, the ITP develops a new creative skill to solve problems with new ideas. When the ITP starts to be used more extensively it reaches beyond ideas and develops Idea Models. The development of Idea Models is not new. The reason breakthrough innovators succeed is because of their natural skill to develop Idea Models that have the capability to project disruptive concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly. The ITP achieves this by empowering the human to become aware of their intelligence, emotion and intuition as being separate mind components that can be used tools. But even more importantly, the ITP pushes the human to become aware of and gain clarity on their life’s personal purpose. When that happens, humans can intentionally make choices (cognitive then physical) that serve their Self-interest purpose rather than unintentionally make choices that lead them into counterproductive extreme experiences. This higher awareness level of purpose within human existence is what allows for Self-control and leads to a higher level of spirituality. Through history, humans have spent lifetimes searching for this knowledge and a path to this elevated spirituality and failed. Now, everyone can have the opportunity to quickly achieve this outcome through a new breakthrough ITP online course, which is currently being offered free for a limited time at: oisource/teachable.com/p/itp

In summary, to completely transform spirituality into a science you need to acquire global clarity and personal purpose on human existence through new paradigms on physics and the ITP. This is going to quickly facilitate a state of awareness that will allow you to start mastering the full Self-control of your choices within a designed condition that otherwise is constantly pushing you, and everyone around you, to extremes. This is the science knowledge that the greatest mystics, saints and prophets described through religious parables. This is the science behind the truth that sets you free.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

A New Breakthrough Process For Innovation


Tectonic forces are colliding in the modern world as cultural and commercial ecosystems are increasingly becoming entangled internally and externally in conflict. Furthermore, the persistent momentum of transformative technology; robotics – artificial intelligence – predictive data modeling and soon quantum computing are going to accentuate this volatility. If we are to find future success in this new environment then finding a path through the maze of ‘what’s next’ is mandatory. That means that innovation is the wormhole through which we must travel to find consistent success and evolve at optimal efficiency.

But depending on the year and field, anywhere from 70% to 95% of new product launches fail and around 75% of all venture capital backed start-ups fail. So it has always been assumed that innovation is just a blind shot in the dark for the few willing to try it. This is now about to change as OIsource consulting (oisource.com) has unearthed a path to innovation as a scientific process for everyone to use. The fundamentals of this process came from years of study in the diverse fields of physics, philosophy and education along with the personal disciplines of ideation, meditation and stoicism. The totality of this learning has brought a unique insight into a new paradigm of human existence that guides OIsource to empower individuals and organizations for the future.

The gateway to that insight and the process for innovation that was derived from it starts with the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process. The ITP is a mental and writing exercise that enables us to intentionally originate, interconnect and validate relevant ideas as the foundation for successful innovation. But the ITP is not a groupthink ideation exercise we are used to. It is a demanding, self-directed, solitary endeavor that challenges us to think differently. The ITP reaches beyond ideas and actually develops Idea Models. This is the reason breakthrough innovators succeed, because of their natural skill to develop Idea Models that have the capability to project future disruptive concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly. Idea Models are the conduits through which Steve Jobs could, in his words; “project the future”. In essence, Idea Models have the dynamism to explain what is presently impossible while simultaneously providing a map to build that impossible through the future maze of ‘what’s next’.

Everyone can now have the opportunity to experience this breakthrough process for innovation with the ITP course, which is currently being offered free for a limited time at: oisource/teachable.com/p/itp

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

A New Process To Generate Relevant Ideas For Innovation

The heart of successful innovation is not just about coming up with new ideas but come up with relevant ideas. This is critical to do in today’s business world where you are constantly required to come up with ideas to address problems in your company. Furthermore, you may be tasked to come up with ideas for products and services as well. If you think about all the ideas you have come up with in the past, maybe around half worked and half didn’t. But statistically the bigger the idea the more likely it is to fail. For instance, depending on the year and field, anywhere from 70% to 95% of new product launches fail and around 75% of all venture capital backed start-ups fail. The people involved in these failures all thought they had great ideas and then invested a lot effort and money to implement them. But clearly there was a disconnect between their ideas and what actually could be successful. The reason these innovators failed is because they did not have a cognitive process for generating relevant ideas.

This may seem like a blanket oversimplification to most people but it would not have been to a man named Edwards Deming. He was a renowned engineer, professor and consultant who lived by a very powerful phrase, which was: “If you can’t describe what you are doing as a process, you don’t know what you’re doing.” So based on this dynamic, if you don’t have a process to come up with relevant ideas then, simply by default, you don’t know what you’re doing. Hence the high rate of innovation failure throughout all fields. To change this dynamic, OIsource (oisource.com) was launched to teach you a skill that will develop your ability to generate relevant ideas to successfully innovate. This is done through a mental and writing exercise that enables the participant to intentionally originate, interconnect and validate ideas. This exercise is called the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process.

The ITP is a demanding, self-directed, solitary endeavor that challenges you to think differently. Research studies are beginning to show that this type of isolated thinking is the most productive form of thinking: https://www.inc.com/​melissa-schilling​/the-science-of-why​-brainstorming​-in-groups-​doesnt-work.html Nikolai Tesla understood this even in his time when he noted: “Originality thrives in seclusion, free of outside influences…”.

The ITP is therefore the complete opposite of the interaction within group ideation sessions you may be used to. But after going through the ITP is when you should participate in a group ideation session. At that point you will have a thorough and deep understanding of the relevance of your ideas. Then you are much better prepared for the group ideation session and it can become more productive and impactful for all parties involved. Ultimately, the skill you develop will empower you to discover your potential of being a high-level innovative thinker.

Experience how effective the ITP can be for you through a new online course that is being offered free for a limited time at: oisource.teachable​.com/p/itp

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Why Augmented Reality Will Be Remarkable And Virtual Reality Will Be Regulated

The remarkable potential of Augmented Reality is just starting to be realized. It will continue to thrive and advance throughout all the fields of business, science, medicine, education, government, military and entertainment. Augmented Reality will then take a hyper leap forward once the Unified Field Theory in physics is understood. At that time it will become accepted that mass and density are independent states interlinked only in nature, but mass specifically can be produced separately within Augmented Reality. This will be achieved by isolating images within areas where intense frequencies can be emitted from one source and then forcibly restricted by another source, thereby increasing the frequencies amplitude to attain mass without density at specific points. In essence, Augmented Reality will evolve into the first Holodeck. This will just be an augmented process of nature where the non-physical constructs of quantum frequencies (i.e. the field) self-restrict into the physical construct of a particle. So that’s the remarkable value of Augmented Reality. It will always be just an extension of nature. Consequently, Augmented Reality will only help humans become more creative and evolve society as a whole.

The reason for this positive outcome is due to Augmented Reality only being superposed onto our Genuine Reality. Therefore no matter how advanced the technology becomes, Augmented Reality will still enable the mind to have a steady connection to our Genuine Reality. This is a critical aspect because Genuine Reality, as-it-is, has enough challenges of emotional and intelligence complexity for the mind to properly function within. So adding any additional interaction with visual and auditory technology only has the result of separating the mind, to one degree or another, from Genuine Reality. In the future, it will be understood that within our Genuine Reality there is already a separation between the physical brain and the cognitive mind. Furthermore the mind is not just one component but comprised of multiple components. Therefore there is an additional separation within your mind between the identity you sense and perceive your Self to be and your thoughts, intuition and emotion. So there are already two stages of separation between your Self and Genuine Reality as-it-is. That’s why something as elementary as a movie can separate your mind, to some extent, from Genuine Reality. This is what Psychology labels as experience-taking.

Since Augmented Reality is only being superposed on Genuine Reality, a combined experience is produced which limits the potential level of additional emotional and intelligence complexity that the mind is challenged with to experience. But Virtual Reality is completely and fundamentally different from Augmented Reality, even though the names and commercial terminology used for both sound similar. They are in fact so radically different that Virtual Reality can actually be described as having the same effect on the mind as poison has on the body. Yes, a correlation can be made between poison and Virtual Reality. Poison unhinges the operating system of a physical organism until it leads to the organism’s failure. So a higher level of poison just leads to an accelerated rate of unhinging the operating system of that organism. In turn, Virtual Reality has the same effect on the cognitive mind. Virtual Reality unhinges the operating system of the cognitive mind until it leads to the mind’s failure to comprehend the difference between Genuine Reality and the substituted Virtual Reality. This is possible because Virtual Reality does not just superpose images and sound but instead substitutes a new reality by completely isolating the minds vision and auditory experience. Therefore the more intense the Virtual Reality, the greater the emotional and intelligence complexity that the mind is challenged with to experience. Which leads to an accelerated rate at which the mind is separated from Genuine Reality. This process of separation from Genuine Reality is what unhinges the operation of the cognitive mind just like poison unhinges the operation of the physical organism.

Inevitably, Virtual Reality technology will advance until its commercial and illicit use will have devastating affects on society. There will be lawsuits against the companies, wherever they may be in the world, making and using this technology. The government will also start targeting those same companies due to the technology being used by criminal organization and rogue nations. Eventually, government will regulate all Virtual Reality technology and designate its use solely to approved agencies. The reason Virtual Reality will not be banned and outlawed completely is because it, like poison, can have extremely beneficial effects in specific circumstances. For instance, specific poison, in specific amounts, under specific controlled conditions, can actually heal and transform organisms. Similarly, Virtual Reality will be used in specific situations in the medical field to heal trauma patients. It will also be used in specific situations in the military field to transform a terrorist into a model citizen. So in the end, Virtual Reality will have uses. But those uses will not be scalable, sustainable or commercial.

This forecast, by itself, will not stop companies and investors from collectively allocating billions of dollars over the next decade into Virtual Reality. But the fact that almost all will lose their entire investment just may give some pause to consider this alternative paradigm. If you are part of a leadership team investing your time and/or money in the development of Virtual Reality then OIsource ( oiscource.com ) can help you create a strategy which will give your investment the best chance of success in the very narrow future window you will have.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Unmasking The Cognitive Process Behind Questions And Why They Are The Linchpin To Innovation


Many articles and books have been written about the importance of questions to achieve innovation. Entrepreneurs and business leaders have also talked about the critical impact questions have on innovation. Eric Schmidt, former Google CEO, went even further when he noted: “We run this company on questions, not answers.”

So there is clearly an immense reliance on questions. Yet not even Neuroscientists understand the cognitive process behind how questions work. Their best guess is that the brain cells produce the mind, which then produces you, who then asks the questions and then proceeds to answer them. Unfortunately, that’s not a scientific model. That’s science fiction. To truly understand a valid cognitive process, a new paradigm called the Mind Model is going to be presented here. It is one where the brain/mind dynamic is identical to the model of how the computer works. The computer has mechanical hardware that is run by an operating system. In turn, the human has biological hardware that is run by an operating system. We label the biological hardware as the brain and the operating system as the mind. In the computer, when the operating system advances to the point of making the mechanical hardware obsolete, that mechanical hardware has to be thrown away and replaced by upgraded hardware. But in a human, the biological hardware that is the brain is continually upgraded by being rewired by the operating system that is the mind.

But that is only a partial description of the Mind Model. The rest of the description is one where the mind is not one single component but is comprised of several separate components. Starting with the main mind component which is you – the identity you sense and perceive your Self to be. This is an important aspect to recognize because there is a critical delineation between your Self and your other mind components. Those other mind components will be labeled henceforth as: Creative Thought, Reactive Thought, Rational Thought, Intuition and Emotion.

Let’s first take a deeper dive into explaining who you are. Your identity includes your core attributes of intelligence, personality, talents, likes, dislikes, strengths and weaknesses. Your identity also includes your memory, for which the new term Personal Knowledge Base will be (i.e. Virtual RAM) substituted from here on. You are also the decision maker. The other mind components of Thought, Intuition and Emotion only present choices for you to make decisions on. These choices are a form of guidance and influence on you that have helped determine who you are now.

These other mind components have been guiding and influencing you throughout your whole life as you were making decisions. Influencing you for good and for bad as well as for collaboration and for conflict (i.e. Cognitive Relativity). Yes, this process of interaction between you and your other mind components has been so seamless and fluid that you have always considered your thinking to be the function of one solitary unit. But it is not. Only you make the ultimate decisions on the choices the other mind components present to you. Jesus and Buddha described these mind components masked in the cloak of religious terms. But societal evolution has now advanced enough for these concepts to finally be openly unmasked in scientific terms.

The last aspect that needs to be described has also, up to now, been masked in religious terms. It deals with where the informational-choices come from that are presented to you by the other mind components. That information originates from one source that will be labeled henceforth as the Universal Knowledge Base (i.e. Virtual ROM). In essence, the other mind components perform a function similar to highly advanced search apps that also originate their information from one source but are customized and personalized for each unique mobile device – which in this case is you. Yes, you are unique, like your iris and fingerprint. Furthermore, out of all the mind components, only you are curious. Only you ask questions. If you already have the answers you need within your Personal Knowledge Base then you would not be asking questions. The act of asking questions means you are seeking answers from a source outside of your Personal Knowledge Base. So when you ask questions internally, the responses are coming in the form of choices from the other mind components. Then you perceive those choices as answers to the questions you asked. The mind components of Creative and Reactive Thought offer you the positive and negative information-based answers that you did not know before to facilitate innovation.

So the process within our complex matrix ecosystem is one where you have free-will to make unique random choices on existing Universal Knowledge Base information for the purpose of co-creating completely new experiences and innovation that has never existed before. But people have not understood this process and therefore have only used it incidentally. With this process unmasked, you are now empowered to use your mind components intentionally, like tools from a toolbox. Yet, this can only happen if you ask questions. So, now we finally get to the crux of the entire paradigm to ask what is so special about questions in this process?

In computer terms, asking questions is like initializing command prompts.
They have three outcomes:
1. Questions give you the mandate to set the agenda for the other mind components to follow and focus on.
2. Questions always prompt a response from the other mind components. Be it in the form of a complete answer, an assumption or just a hint.
3. Questions unlock and make room in your Personal Knowledge Base to receive and store new information from the answers you receive.

When you are not asking questions the other mind components are guiding and influencing you with their own agenda. Also without asking questions your Personal Knowledge Base is blocked from retaining any new information, therefore severely limiting your ability to innovate. In essence, you are either using the other mind components or they are using you. The other mind components using you has been observed by Psychology and given many different labels. One of those labels is ‘automaticity’ or the ability to effortlessly take actions. This ability of being able to act without really thinking about it is the state most people are engaged in most of the time.

So now we understand there to be two types of completely different mind functions that can happen in your mind. The first type is where you are able to make effortless and fast decisions on the agenda the other mind components set for you. There is no potential for Self-identity growth in this reactive mindset. Therefore it has also been labeled by Psychology as a ‘fixed mindset’. Then there is the secondary type mind function comprised of laborious and slow thinking. Within this type of thinking you are setting the agenda by asking questions, analyzing the answers to those questions and accessing your own Personal Knowledge Base to solve problems. There is nearly unlimited potential for Self-identity growth in this creative mindset. This has been labeled by Psychology as a ‘growth mindset’. Again, you are either using your mind components by asking questions or the mind components are using you. That is why questions are the linchpin to the cognitive process of originating new ideas for innovation. And the highest level of this process is not just to originate new ideas but to use the technique breakthrough innovators use and develop Idea Models.

At this point you may be asking if there is a bold use for this paradigm? The answer is yes, and it is anchored in the understanding that millions of future years of information in the form of breakthrough physics and technology exists and can potentially be sourced. While the construct of planned randomness (i.e. Uncertainty Principle) ensures that future human experiences and conflicts remain only as planned probabilities, the information for breakthrough physics and technology to continually evolve sentient societies is set. Everything from powerful conscious AI, to medical instruments that use frequencies in repairing DNA, to geometric shaped starships that are propelled forward at near light speed – without resistance – by internally moving magnetic fields that move external space-matter/space-time around the vessel. ALL. THIS. INFORMATION. EXISTS. NOW. And it can be sourced through questions and Idea Models. Wouldn’t it be fun to hack our matrix ecosystem and go source it?

These Mind Model concepts are not isolated. They are derived from a larger physics Unified Field Theory model. The full documentation on this new paradigm is found at: oisource.com/why-we-exist. But the only place you can learn the practical application to this paradigm, to come up with the right questions and to use your other mind components as tools to develop Idea Models, is in the OIsource ( oisource.com ) training. Contact us to find out how to make our innovation training experience work for you and your company.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The Bold Strategy To Transform U.S. Education Into America’s Most Promising Opportunity

 

The following three-step process develops a bold strategy for any large organization:

  • Define the main challenge.
  • Understand the critical factor within that challenge.
  • Apply organizational strength into the ‘most promising opportunity’ within the critical factor.

So let’s use this process to develop a bold strategy for a large organization called America.

First Step:
The main challenge for America is to grow its economy.

Second Step:
The critical factor for the growth of the American economy is having communities be the vehicles, along with their companies that are the internal engines, to continually innovate. (In turn, that innovation level will dictate how quickly the adjacent government and financial systems are forced to evolve).

Third Step:
The organizational strength of America is its ability to empower and then benefit from trillions of internal decentralized, diverse and competing choices being made within communities. The ‘most promising opportunity’ within any one community is a school of U.S. Education that needs to produce individuals with evolving skill sets to continually foster innovation. So America’s organizational strength should be applied to its most promising opportunity. That is to achieve an outcome of U.S. Education, as a whole, benefiting from its own internal decentralized, diverse and competing choices.

But this has not happened because American leadership has failed to understand their role within the bold strategy. Consequently, U.S. Education is not set up to foster innovation skill sets but is instead focused on copying centralized education systems of other countries. But other centralized education systems will always seem more successful because they are more effective at developing homogenous students that can memorize and regurgitate current information – which is the opposite of achieving an innovation skill set. So the counter productive focus of U.S. Education actually has the result of negating America’s organizational strength and turning its most promising opportunity into its greatest weakness.

But this failure can be overcome with a breakthrough solution. That solution is to implement a system that will be the internal engine that continually advances and innovates the vehicle of U.S. Education. LED accelerator
( CreateLEDaccelerator.com ) would achieve this result by being a dual system within U.S. Education that will develop high-level creative thinkers. LED accelerator, which stands for Leadership Empowering Diversity, shares the goals of other dual systems like Xerox, PARC, DARPA and Google X that were created to be vertically intensive within their respective parent organization. The difference with LED accelerator is that malleable brains of the selected gifted students are going to be continuously wired for adaptive algorithms by their experiences. LED accelerator students will collaborate and compete using tools that exist in the current world to manifest the products and services they intuitively see existing in the future world. This is a process of intentionally developing our future breakthrough innovators and adult leaders. This dual system will be sustainable because the hyper competitive student teams, within each LED accelerator school district, will continually adopt best practices, learning strategies and interactive culture from the decentralized, diverse and competing choices the student teams will be making.

In turn, the continually changing curriculum and team achievement results will provide for educators and administrators the evidence-based data on which aspects of LED accelerator can be scaled and implemented in U.S. Education, the parent organization. So internally generated evidence-based data of LED accelerator will be the impetus to continually innovate the entire U.S. Education system ahead of evolving needs of American communities.

Full documentation on this paradigm is found at: CreateLEDaccelerator.com

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn