Monthly Archives: November 2018

The Bold Strategy To Transform U.S. Education Into America’s Most Promising Opportunity

 

The following three-step process develops a bold strategy for any large organization:

  • Define the main challenge.
  • Understand the critical factor within that challenge.
  • Apply organizational strength into the ‘most promising opportunity’ within the critical factor.

So let’s use this process to develop a bold strategy for a large organization called America.

First Step:
The main challenge for America is to grow its economy.

Second Step:
The critical factor for the growth of the American economy is having communities be the vehicles, along with their companies that are the internal engines, to continually innovate. (In turn, that innovation level will dictate how quickly the adjacent government and financial systems are forced to evolve).

Third Step:
The organizational strength of America is its ability to empower and then benefit from trillions of internal decentralized, diverse and competing choices being made within communities. The ‘most promising opportunity’ within any one community is a school of U.S. Education that needs to produce individuals with evolving skill sets to continually foster innovation. So America’s organizational strength should be applied to its most promising opportunity. That is to achieve an outcome of U.S. Education, as a whole, benefiting from its own internal decentralized, diverse and competing choices.

But this has not happened because American leadership has failed to understand their role within the bold strategy. Consequently, U.S. Education is not set up to foster innovation skill sets but is instead focused on copying centralized education systems of other countries. But other centralized education systems will always seem more successful because they are more effective at developing homogenous students that can memorize and regurgitate current information – which is the opposite of achieving an innovation skill set. So the counter productive focus of U.S. Education actually has the result of negating America’s organizational strength and turning its most promising opportunity into its greatest weakness.

But this failure can be overcome with a breakthrough solution. That solution is to implement a system that will be the internal engine that continually advances and innovates the vehicle of U.S. Education. LED accelerator
( CreateLEDaccelerator.com ) would achieve this result by being a dual system within U.S. Education that will develop high-level creative thinkers. LED accelerator, which stands for Leadership Empowering Diversity, shares the goals of other dual systems like Xerox, PARC, DARPA and Google X that were created to be vertically intensive within their respective parent organization. The difference with LED accelerator is that malleable brains of the selected gifted students are going to be continuously wired for adaptive algorithms by their experiences. LED accelerator students will collaborate and compete using tools that exist in the current world to manifest the products and services they intuitively see existing in the future world. This is a process of intentionally developing our future breakthrough innovators and adult leaders. This dual system will be sustainable because the hyper competitive student teams, within each LED accelerator school district, will continually adopt best practices, learning strategies and interactive culture from the decentralized, diverse and competing choices the student teams will be making.

In turn, the continually changing curriculum and team achievement results will provide for educators and administrators the evidence-based data on which aspects of LED accelerator can be scaled and implemented in U.S. Education, the parent organization. So internally generated evidence-based data of LED accelerator will be the impetus to continually innovate the entire U.S. Education system ahead of evolving needs of American communities.

Full documentation on this paradigm is found at: CreateLEDaccelerator.com

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Why Google Is One Of The Few Organizations In History That Has Earned A Legacy

The concept of a Legacy is misunderstood as something having to do with a large organization achieving recognized successful outcomes. It does not. A Legacy is a progression level higher than success. A Legacy means that in future history a large organization will be remembered, not for its success, but for the significance of its impact on societal evolution in its time.

It is not enough for an organization to have a mission and vision statement to intentionally achieve a Legacy. If a large organization aspires to be historically significant, it must also develop a Legacy statement along with a strategic plan on how to execute it. A Legacy statement for any organization is understood through the universal and scalable objective of:

Abundant resources will be used and wasted
on attaining what is scarce.

At the macro level, within the cosmological organization, the resources of energy and time are abundant. So those resources are used to create billions of complex galaxy systems, each having billions of suns and solar systems. The abundant resources of time and energy are wasted on the creation of these systems in order to attain what is scarce. That scarce objective is the small quantity of evolving sentient life on habitable planets. That is why iconic physicist Fred Hoyle noted: “The notion that not only the biopolymer but the operating program of a living cell could be arrived at by chance in a primordial organic soup here on the Earth is evidently nonsense of a high order.” 

There are about 2000 enzymes on Earth. The chance of obtaining them all in a random trial by accident is impossible, even if the rest of the cosmos consisted of (which it does not) an “organic soup”. So at the macro level, there is clearly an intentional strategy being executed to waste abundant resources to attain what is scarce. That is a Legacy at the level of cosmological evolution.

At the micro level, within any large human run organization, the resources of proprietary goods, services, skills and access to capital are abundant. The low price point of the resources dictates their status as abundant. Once those resources are identified, the large organization needs to decide what scarce objective it will waste its abundance on. It does not mean the entire organization needs to do this. A division thereof will do. It also does not mean the venture should lose money. Huge profit is possible.

But to date there has been no intentional strategy for any organization to waste abundant resources to attain what is scarce. That is why throughout history there have been instances of large organizations that only incidentally achieved what we now recognize as a Legacy. Those organizations did not have that as their objective but they achieved a Legacy none-the-less. Here are some examples of what their Legacy statements may have stated if those organizations had that as their intentional objective:

Alexander III of Macedon’s (Alexander the Great) organization:
The Macedonian military will use their resources to uproot stagnant fiefdoms in order to impact vast regions with significant cultural diffusion and innovation.

Gandhi’s organization:
The Indian people will use their bodies and volition as resources to force out subjugation in order to impact on world consciousness how structured non-violent disobedience can be employed instead of armed conflict.

Google’s organization:
Google will use their resources to facilitate world-wide prompt access to constantly updated relevant information in order to impact human ability to learn and assimilate that information into new ideas, concepts and understanding.

History has shown us that the success and effect most organizations have on society, no matter how large they become, is short-term. But now the reason has been unmasked to why some organizations are able to achieve a long-term impact, far beyond their existence. A path to earn a Legacy has been outlined. If you are part of the leadership team of a large organization, then you have an opportunity to intentionally achieve eternal significance; a Legacy. OIsource ( oisource.com ) can help you create that Legacy statement and the strategy to achieve it.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Why LED Accelerator Is The Sustainable And Scalable Future Of U.S. Education

With relatively minor adjustments, a schoolteacher from decades ago would feel right at home within the modern classroom. Other than replacing books with tablets, there has been little system advancement. In the past, educational excellence meant providing students equal opportunity to learn information that was not easily or publically accessible. Today, information is available for free anywhere, anytime, for anyone with Internet access. Furthermore, the biggest impact on society is yet to come from artificial intelligence, big data, robotics and quantum computing. All this technology has made information a commodity that no longer has any value in education. So the current process of forcing students to memorize information and then grading them on how well they regurgitate it is obsolete. Students already understand this and know that their education has become self-defeating as it teaches them to compete with technology rather than using it as a tool. In the future, the value of education will reside solely in how students’ minds can be engaged to creatively find, aggregate, transform and use information in new ways. Creative skills will ultimately define professional and personal success.

Consequently, individualized Project Based Learning, intertwined with the arts, will be the ultimate future of U.S. Education and will be the best way to stimulate creativity. Yet educators cannot explain, as a process, how to establish and then continually innovate an ever-changing Project Based Learning curriculum. Furthermore this curriculum cannot just have short-term success. It must be sustainable, scalable and innovate ahead of the needs of an evolving society around it. Yes, U.S. Education should not be decades behind but instead should be decades ahead of society. Unfortunately educators are completely and totally out of their league to achieve these necessary results even though they will be forced to try. ‘Education experts’ will experiment with teaching systems for decades to come until evidence starts pointing to a system that can be successful. This will be a chaotic transition with many brutal failures. These transitional system experiments will waste generations of students’ lives as well as being detrimental for society. But these future failures can be bypassed with a breakthrough solution. That solution is to implement a system that will continually advance and innovate U.S. Education from the inside.

LED accelerator ( CreateLEDaccelerator.com ) would achieve these results by being a dual system within U.S. Education that will develop high-level creative thinkers. LED accelerator, which stands for Leadership Empowering Diversity, shares the goals of other dual systems like Xerox, PARC, DARPA and Google X that were created to be vertically intensive within their respective parent organization. The difference with LED accelerator is that malleable brains of the selected gifted students are going to be continuously wired for adaptive algorithms by their experiences. LED accelerator students will collaborate and compete using tools that exist in the current world to manifest the products and services they intuitively see existing in the future world. This is a process of intentionally developing our future breakthrough innovators and adult leaders. This dual system will be sustainable because the hyper competitive student teams, within each LED accelerator school district, will continually adopt best practices, learning strategies and interactive culture.

In turn, the continually changing curriculum and team achievement results will provide for administrators the evidence-based data on which aspects of LED accelerator can be scaled and implemented in U.S. Education, the parent organization. So the current process of relying on failed guesses of ‘education experts’ to originate future curriculum and doctrines will cease. The internally generated evidence-based data of LED accelerator will be the impetus to continually innovate the entire U.S. Education system ahead of evolving social, economic, government and military needs.

This type of dual system, no matter what it’s named, within U.S. Education will absolutely be the eventual end-system that all Project Based Learning experiments will lead to. There is no way around it, as the gifted students have always and will always separate themselves from the general student population when they are unchained from their desks. It is by design that naturally gifted individuals have the potential, when developed, to lead and guide the evolution of society. So this breakthrough solution for U.S. Education is just part of that leadership to bypass the future failures of ‘education experts’ and proactively launch the first beta LED accelerator system now.

Full documentation on this paradigm is found at: CreateLEDaccelerator.com

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Unmasking How Intelligence Collaborates With Emotion to Facilitate Human Innovation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jw-o7qoBlDE

All intelligence is artificial. This is because intelligence is just aggregated algorithms. An algorithm is aggregated math. Math is aggregated information. And information in-of-itself is artificial. This means that the intelligence associated with a computer, or an insect or a human, is artificial. The only reason humans perceive our intelligence as being real {nous}, and in essence non-artificial, is because of emotion. So emotion is the non-artificial component that makes human artificial intelligence attain significance and purpose. But both intelligence and emotion function through a process. Therefore both are systems. So our cognitive reality can be understood as being a process where an Artificial Intelligence System interacts and collaborates with a Non-Artificial Emotion System.

At OIsource (oisource.com) we unmasked this cognitive process and created a mental and writing exercise that teaches entrepreneurs and corporate teams a skill to innovate. We did this through a new paradigm of the brain/mind dynamic we call the Mind Model that will outline here. But before we do that we need to first present an overview of the currently accepted Neuroscience model as a baseline. The best guess of Neuroscience is that the brain produces the mind. The synopsis of this model is one where the brain cell, which does not know or care who you are, gets together with billions of other brain cells, which do not know or care who you are. This produces; the identity you sense your-self to be, multiple strains of divergent thought and emotion. Unfortunately, that is not a scientific model. That’s science fiction.

In contrast the concepts of the brain/mind dynamic within the Mind Model are identical to the model of how the computer works. The computer has mechanical hardware that is run by an operating system. In turn, the human has biological hardware that is also run by an operating system. We label the biological hardware as the physical brain and the operating system as the cognitive mind. In the computer, when the operating system advances to the point of making the mechanical hardware obsolete, that mechanical hardware has to be upgraded by being replaced. But in a human, the biological hardware that is the brain is continually upgraded by being rewired by the operating system that is the mind. In turn, the mind itself is comprised of a dual structure artificial intelligence system and non-artificial emotion system that interact and collaborate together.

Each human mind saves all sensory information input that the body sees, hears and experiences to its own personal knowledge base {long-term memory}. The personal knowledge base is like a hard drive of experience-created information that the mind can access, use and aggregate into new innovation {incremental theory}. In this process, the mind’s force {volts} and transmission capacity {amps} is limited by how the physical brain is neurologically wired. Therefore it becomes necessary for the brain to be constantly rewired by the mind to accommodate the mind’s increasing force and transmission capacity needs. So the more the mind is stimulated to aggregate information into innovation, the more the mind has to rewire and expand the brain’s capabilities. But the physical brain offers resistance {ohms} to the cognitive mind rewiring it. Emotion within this process acts as a catalyst that stimulates the rewiring of the brain by constantly changing the force, direction and aggregation of information into new innovation.

This model of the brain/mind dynamic is not an isolated theory. It is derived from a larger physics Unified Field Theory model. The full documentation on this new paradigm is found at: oisource.com/why-we-exist The main take-away from this paradigm is that the artificial nature of human and mechanical intelligence is the same. But the biological hardware of the brain and the interaction with emotion within the mind completely transforms the capability of human intelligence. That is the advantage of human intelligence over mechanical intelligence to innovate. Because only with the collaboration of emotion can human intelligence navigate the vast ocean of available data, aggregate specific information from divergent fields and then innovate something entirely new of significance and relevance. Mechanical intelligence will never be able to do this because it will never acquire emotion, no matter how powerful it becomes.

But you and your company still need a path through the constantly advancing and disruptive technology. OIsource offers you this path by teaching you to use your intelligence and emotion as tools to innovate. Contact us to find out how to make our innovation training experience work for you and your company.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Why Breakthrough Innovators Develop Idea Models And How You Can Learn That Skill

We all recognize that global competition and innovation is constantly accelerating. Many people are also starting to face additional challenges from new technologies of artificial intelligence, big data and robotics. In the future, the way we combat these challenges to become successful is by coming up with new ideas that lead to innovation.

However, just incidentally coming up with new ideas will no longer be adequate. The advancement of globalization and disruptive technologies will create an innovation battlefield that will require innovators to intentionally and systematically come up with relevant new ideas that can lead to innovation. OIsource (oisource.com) was launched to empower innovators in this new battlefield. We teach entrepreneurs and corporate teams a cognitive process that develops their skill to innovate. This is done through a mental and writing exercise that enables the participant to intentionally originate, interconnect and validate ideas so they have the best chance to be successful. We call this exercise the ITP, which stands for Innovative Thinking Process.

But the ITP goes far beyond just originating new ideas. The ITP actually develops Idea Models. This is the reason breakthrough innovators succeed, because they reach beyond new ideas with their natural skill to develop Idea Models. The development of models is not unique to breakthrough innovators; it’s in fact now a mandatory process for scientists to develop mathematical, physical and conceptual models.

But unlike other models, the Idea Models are kinetic and not static. Idea Models have the capability to project future disruptive concepts that cannot yet be experienced directly. Models are the conduits through which Steve Jobs could, in his words; “project the future”. In essence, models have the dynamism to explain what is presently impossible while simultaneously providing a map to build that impossible.

Furthermore, the specific stages of the ITP are like program coding for the mind. In this analogy using the ITP is like upgrading your software. The more you use it, the more innovative your mind becomes. So if used day-in and day-out, the ITP will systematically push you to become a high-level innovative thinker. Those learned skills also yield the only path to ultimately find out if you have the ability of mastering those skills to become a breakthrough innovator.

All this is possible because the ITP was derived from an advanced new paradigm on the brain/mind dynamic. We call this new way of looking at your mind and how it works; the Mind Model. It came from years of research within the fields of neuroscience, physics and philosophy, as well as insight from the methods of ideation, meditation and stoicism. The full documentation of this new paradigm is on oisource.com. But the only place you can learn the practical application of this paradigm is in the ITP training experience. Contact us to find out how to make the ITP training work for you and your company.

 

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn