Monthly Archives: December 2016

An Open Letter To Peter Thiel

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Ep9XcJbnk8

Peter,

Here are three concepts that you have publicly expressed interest in:
1. To find something that’s true, that almost nobody agrees with.
2. To fix an institutionalized and homogenized education system.
3. To advance the developed world by being vertically intensive.

All three concepts are addressed as a process individually below. As well as being interconnected within a new paradigm that will emerge after a specific event takes place. That event is the launch of LED accelerator – CreateLEDaccelerator.com – a new dual system program within U.S. Education that will develop Zero to One breakthrough innovators.

First: To develop an understanding of breakthrough innovation, a new framework needs to be described within which the cognitive mind and the physical brain are distinct constructs of one system. The traits of personality, intuition, emotion and thought cannot originate from a brain cell. The breakdown of a cell goes to molecules, atoms, subatomic particles and all the way to quantum planck length frequencies. Furthermore, the brain cell dies every 12 years. Consequently, there is simply no capacity within the construct of matter to harbor the cognitive mind. In computer terminology, the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is the operating system that runs and restructures the brain.

The human mind saves to memory all information input that the body sees, hears and experiences. Memory is therefore just information that the mind can access and assimilate to attain unique perspectives. This output process results in created incremental innovation. In contrast, breakthrough innovation is discovered because that information already exists and just needs to be sourced. Breakthrough innovators use their discovered information to establish new guideposts and direction for incremental innovators and the rest of society to follow. The existence of the cosmos is not left to chance and neither is human evolution. “God does not play dice”.

Second: The premise of U.S. Education forcing students to memorize information and then grading them on how well they regurgitate it, is now obsolete. This process wires the mind completely against creativity and critical thinking. Furthermore, no part of the U.S. Education system exists to specifically recognize and develop our potential breakthrough innovator adolescents. The special skills of those adolescents are snuffed out, re-channeled to fit conventional career fields or disciplined for incremental innovation. That is why breakthrough innovators like Steve Jobs came into existence by pure chance, in spite of the education system. The solution is to disrupt U.S. Education from inside.

Individualized Project Based Learning is the future of U.S. Education. But educators cannot explain, as a process, how to establish and evolve it. Educators will therefore cautiously experiment and waste generations of students’ lives until a process starts to develop. LED accelerator will break this bottleneck by developing adolescents that will adopt best practices as they strive to pursue big opportunity goals. Continually changing outcomes will provide evidence-based data on what aspects of LED accelerator can be implemented as guideposts for Project Based Learning. This process will then continually advance U.S. Education as a whole.

Third: LED accelerator shares the goals of other dual systems like Xerox, PARC, DARPA and Google X, that were created to be vertically intensive within their respective parent organization. The difference is that malleable brains of adolescents in this system are simultaneously being wired for adaptive algorithms by their experiences to better source innovation. LED accelerator adolescents will collaborate and compete while using tools that exist in the current world to manifest the products and services they intuitively see existing in the future world. Within this process they will face adversity and fail more than they succeed. Hence, they will all develop resiliency. As adults, that trait will be forged into courage.

Courage along with a honed intellectual and intuitive capability will be the skill set foundation of future leaders. This foundation will be crucial to successfully meet the immense challenge of guiding society with and through constant disruptive innovation. That is why LED accelerator adolescents will grow up to be leaders within the private, public, military and religious sectors of this exceptional nation. But societies in other developed nations will also need guideposts to follow as well. So LED accelerator is not just a program that will Make America Great Again. It will be the sustainable core of American Exceptionalism to lead the world.

In Conclusion: At this point you may be thinking that this new paradigm is limited to utilitarian tactics and strategy. Where is the breathtaking long-range vision and fun behind it you ask. It is anchored in the understanding that millions of future years of information in the form of breakthrough physics and technology can potentially be sourced. While the construct of planned randomness ensures that future human experiences and conflicts remain only as planned probabilities, the information for breakthrough physics and technology is set. Everything from Strong AI bots, to medical instruments that use frequencies in repairing DNA, to disc shaped Starships that without drag are propelled forward at near light speed by moving space-matter and spacetime around the vessel. [The current static model of spacetime is incorrect because it is the dynamic 5th force within one unified field. Some of the effects of this 5th force is attributed to nonexistent dark matter and dark energy placeholders.] Additionally, travel between star systems will be made possible by going through Einstein-predicted wormholes to explore the Milky Way frontier and engage its millions of sentient inhabited worlds.
ALL. THIS. INFORMATION. EXISTS. NOW.
Wouldn’t it be fun to hack our matrix ecosystem and go source it?

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Self directed learning needs to be led by evidence based processes

aaeaaqaaaaaaaadhaaaajgvhmwfjodc1ltuzm2itndzjyi1iytyxltazogvknjhlndk4oq

Article on self-directed learning by Tom Vander Ark.

Self-directed learning is the future of U.S. Education. But to get to that sustainable outcome there will be hesitant and cautious experiment after experiment. All the while U.S. Education will be constantly behind the innovation curve. LED accelerator will break this bottleneck by developing its own unique doctrines and learning strategies.  The hyper competitive adolescents within each LED accelerator will continuously adopt best practices to evolve their culture and strive to address Big Opportunities. Outcomes will be sustainable because they will be continuously analyzed and debated by educators to provide evidence-based data on what aspects of the ever evolving LED accelerator processes can be implemented to advance U.S. Education as a whole. More information found on: CreateLEDaccelerator.com

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The Failure of Physics

voice-on-ivory-physics-alt

I have worked on my Unified Field Theory for many years. Since it is sourced through my mental filter, it is written in my phenomenological description. I have been over it with theoretical physicists. The only request I had from them is to translate the UFT from my phenomenological description into their academic physics description. That is a fundamental first step so that we all can reference a common language. But it was almost impossible for them to do. It turns out that the creativity of academic physicists has been damaged beyond repair by the outdated education system which nurtures a group-thing approach. They don’t even realize their field is in failure.

Physicists have discovered enough information about our physical phenomena to make their current models obsolete. But they are not rethinking their models or working toward a genuine end. Instead, physicists are obfuscating the failure of their models through hollow corrections, façade of math equations and institution pretense in order to validate their continued funding.

Furthermore, the current models of the physical phenomena have an underlying premise that particle existence and interaction is gratuitous. At its foundation, this is intellectually irrational because that premise would dictate consequences of chaos rather than organization. This is contradicted by the reality that our atomic to cosmological systems are complex organizations. Furthermore there is clear evidence all systems (mineral, botanical and biological) are continually advancing to higher states of organization. Therefore an underlying purpose and continual effort to execute that purpose must exist.

The understanding of matter and the four fundamental forces is incomplete. The understanding of the fifth fundamental force, currently attributed to non-existent placeholders of dark matter and dark energy, is completely wrong. Multiple isolated and contradicting models have been developed to explain these physical phenomena. This is tolerable as a temporary transition to a Unified Field Theory. But it is intellectually dishonest for isolated and contradicting models to be accepted, as they are currently, as permanent explanations. Since it is concurrently accepted that Einstein was correct when he made it clear that the right model needs to be a unified one based on the field. In total, this irrational, wrong, incomplete and dishonest approach amounts to a failed state of physics.

A failed state of physics would not affect the world if it were not for the fact that physics is the mother of all science. Therefore the failure of physics has a direct affect on the tethered life and social sciences. The academia within the fields of chemistry, biology, sociology and economics do not understand that they are analyzing the interface of our reality and not its information based nature:
Chemists do not understand the nature of climate and ecological changes.
Biologists do not understand the natures of bacteria, viruses and cancers.
Sociologists do not understand the nature of ego and intolerance.
Economists do not understand the nature of money and reactive financial systems.

Consequently, these tethered sciences provide abhorrent guidance and solutions to government organizations. This compounds problems that, within an integrated world, metastasize and accelerate into international toxic ecosystems. Blame is then allocated on a variety of other factors, when the core cause is the failure of physics.

The main reason this failed state of physics exists is due to internationally homogenized, hierarchical education systems and associated heuristics that have limited conceptual diversity. Consequently, the reactive process of physicists working with ‘accepted methods’ and ‘accepted models’ takes academic precedence over the creative requirement to innovate a disruptive Unified Field Theory model. If any company in the private sector had this type of reactive culture, all their innovation would cease.

The integrity of physics requires a reboot, through a conceptually coherent, hypothetical Unified Field Theory model. Continuing with the status quo is not an option. The world’s first Unified Field Theory is now available on:  CreateLEDaccelerator.com/physics

Whichever organization implements the new paradigm outlined within this site first will attain an unmatched competitive advantage within their business or science ecosystem.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

A New Paradigm On The Cosmos And Human Existence

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vAhtgP-1qe4

 

TED talk video above offers an excellent introduction overview on how the foundation of our physical reality is constructed from information.

Like sound waves and breathing, the cosmos system functions through cycles of expansion (i.e. big bang) and contraction (i.e. big crunch). Expansion and contraction are opposing binary dualities that are found (like fractals) throughout the microcosm atomic level to the macrocosm cosmological level. Some more examples:

1. Contraction / Negative  / 0  /  Black  /  Reactive  /  Entropy   / Repulsion /  input    etc.
2. Expansion  /  Positive   /  1 /  White  /  Creative  /   Syntropy / Attraction  /  output  etc.

The consequences of these (and other) binary dualities allow relativity to exist within the cosmos.

So the cosmos system does not exist by chance. The cosmos is a macrocosm of a huge corporation that is made from and interacts with information. Like a corporation, the cosmos has billions of regions called galaxies. Each region has billions of divisions called solar systems. Each division has production centers called planets. Guiding the cosmos is a CEO. Like in all corporations, the absolute main job of the CEO is to allocate resources and look for new growth opportunities. Society has labeled the cosmos CEO as God. In typical hierarchical structure, below the CEO is a leadership team comprised of numerous levels of executives and managers. Society has labeled that cosmos leadership team as angles. Below the leadership team are the workers. Society has labeled those cosmos workers as sentient beings. A corporation exists to produce a diverse product offering. In turn, the cosmos also exists to produce a diverse product offering called New Information. So the business purpose of the cosmos is to continually produce New Information.

Within the cosmos, all sentient life resides in the Milky Way galaxy. But of all the planets in the Milky Way, the botanical and biological life on Earth has the highest level of: challenge, diversity, conflict, competition, and adaptation. In total, Earth has the highest density/intensity level of life (i.e. physical challenges). On Earth, a blade of grass will crack concrete in its push towards the sun. Life is able to exist in the depths of freezing oceans to the depths of volcanic lava. Life on Earth also has the highest density/intensity level of thought/emotion (i.e. cognitive challenges). Humans have the highest level of cognitive aspects, which includes the entire emotional duality spectrum from: rage to tranquility, bonding to rejection, hate to compassion, despair to elation, intolerance to empathy, and failure to success. This immense thought/emotion range gives a human the potential to kill millions of others or to sacrifice themselves for millions of others, and all levels of action in between. In societal terms, humans have the most potential to commit the highest evil to the highest good. Consequently, our immense emotional and physical challenge spectrum gives human interaction the highest potential to produce the most New Information. More in depth explanation on:  AntonKrutz.com/physics

Whichever organization implements the new paradigm outlined within this site first will attain an unmatched competitive advantage within their business or science ecosystem.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

The Cognitive Components Of The Mind

voice-on-ivory-physics-alt

Through history mankind’s innovation was based on gaining an understanding of how aspects of nature function. For artificial intelligence to become truly revolutionary, neuroscience must first understand what the cognitive mind actually is.

The traits of personality, intuition, emotion and thought cannot originate from a brain cell. The breakdown of a cell goes to molecules, atoms, subatomic particles and all the way down to quantum planck length frequencies. Furthermore, the brain cell dies every 12 years. Consequently, there is simply no capacity within the construct of matter to harbor the cognitive mind. In essence, the mind and brain are two distinct constructs of one system. In computer terminology, the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is the operating system that runs and restructures the brain.

But the cognitive mind itself is also composed of multiple components. That is why when Jean-Paul Sartre was analyzing Descartes’s statement “I think therefore I am.” had this observation of his own: “The conscious that says ‘I am’ is not the conscious that thinks.”  So here are the terms that will be used decades from now to describe these cognitive components:

Microconscious             (Self – entity humans sense themselves to be)
Conscious                      (Soul – creative thoughts)
Subconscious                 (Ego – reactive thoughts)
Mind Consciousness      (Rational – impartial thoughts)

Here are the processes for these cognitive components that will be understood decades from now:

The Conscious, Subconscious and Mind Consciousness offer choices to the Microconscious in the form of thoughts. But thoughts always come with emotion and action attached. So Thought-Emotion-Action (TEA) units are available to the Microconscious as choices to select from. Presently, ‘free will’ of a Microconscious is limited to those multiple sources. This until the Microconscious evolves the ability to create its own Original Thought. Evolving this ability is accomplished within a process where the Microconscious uses multiple sources of TEA to attain an experience involving diverse viewpoints and competition – two fundamental conditions required to create Original Thought.

A balanced level of Subconscious TEA is the strongest catalyst in the process to create Original Thought. Also, a balanced level of Subconscious TEA is responsible for humans having the very important trait of skepticism. But a dominant Subconscious TEA leads to what is termed in society as ‘suffering’. An extreme influence of Subconscious TEA leads to what is termed in society as ‘evil’. To achieve a productive society, ‘religious’ cultural immersion has been the external mechanism used to date in guiding the Microconscious to regulate and co-opt the influence of Subconscious TEA.

So our reality is itself an AI matrix set up to train the Microconscious to attain Original Thought. All the drama of diversity, conflict and intense competition within humanity exists for the purpose of creating new experiences and eventually, Original Thought. More in depth explanation on: AntonKrutz.com/physics

Whichever organization implements the new paradigm outlined within this site first will attain an unmatched competitive advantage within their business or science ecosystem.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

A New Paradigm On Biology


voice-on-ivory-physics-alt

Viruses, bacteria and parasites are biological smart devices. They are just like mechanical smart devices (like smart phones for instance), which only act ‘smart’ because they source information from a separate physical infrastructure to function. In turn, the biological smart devices only act ‘smart’ because they also source information to function. But instead, they source it from a separate virtual infrastructure, that contains billions of future years of stored information.

That is why biological smart devices have the ability to constantly adapt to most every aspect of nature and space, as well as most every human created ‘cure’. In essence, even though they’re microscopic, they act with the intelligence of a huge supercomputer. That is why human created cures are just triggers for the biological smart devices to access a higher level of information and adapt. This aspect of our matrix exists to provide humans with physical and mental resistance and challenge.

However, scientists do not understand this paradigm. So hundreds of billions of dollars are wasted on inconsequential and counterproductive medical experiments. This is because researchers are mistakenly analyzing the interface of our matrix and not its information based nature. Further explanation on: AntonKrutz.com/thought-leadership.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Developing Breakthrough Innovators in U.S. Education

Breakthrough innovators throughout history have described their work as a process of discovery, always sensing a final vision of what they eventually manifested. Within this process all past and future breakthrough innovation has always existed conceptually, ready to be sourced by breakthrough innovators. It was possible for breakthrough innovators to do this because they were coincidentally positioned in their fields along with having brains that were naturally wired with developed algorithms, to be able to source the innovation.

Since there is a process to discover breakthrough innovation, there is therefore a process to develop future breakthrough innovators. This process takes the form of LED accelerator, a dual system program within U.S. Education. LED accelerator will accelerate how breakthrough innovation is discovered and then beneficially allocated within society. The select adolescents within this program will grow up to be leaders within the private, public, military and religious sectors of this exceptional nation. In turn, the future core of American Exceptionalism to lead the world, will run through this program.

More in depth explanation is found on: CreateLEDaccelerator.com

 

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn

Where Does Memory Reside?

brain-ct-scan-tpool-stock4b-crop1

This article Why You’ll Remember This Column discusses how a neuroscientist surgically removed parts of a rats cortical tissue to see if he could methodically discover what part of the rats brain held the memory of a path to navigate a maze to food. To his surprise the memory of the maze was still there even though substantial portion of the brain were removed.

Neuroscience will not be able to understand this outcome while it believes that memory along with all the other traits of self, emotion, thought, personality and intuition reside in the cells of the physical brain. Memory along with those other traits reside in the cognitive mind. In essence, the mind and brain are two distinct constructs of one system. In computer terminology, the brain is like an adaptive biological motherboard while the mind is the operating system that runs and restructures the brain. So even when the brain is damaged (or even parts removed), the mind can neurologically re-wire/re-structure the brain to be usable. This why information in the form of all of life’s memories/experiences not only survives the damage of the brain but ultimately survives the death of the brain. That information is always housed in the mind. More in depth explanation on the cognitive phenomena can be found at: AntonKrutz.com/physics  In the ‘Purpose’ section.

Share: Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn